OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

uddi-spec message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] The v3.0.1 Specification has been posted for 30-day review

Some very small comments - all probably qualify as typos:
section 1.4 specifies UDDI.org in both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 - should that now be OASIS? Or our tech committee?
section 1.7 para 2 line 2 has "principle" where it should have "principal".
section - should that be "contains a part of the actual address in text form" rather than "contains the actual address in text form"? The current text suggests that the entire address is contained within the addressline.
section - does this diagram mean to require that all keyed reference groups be placed after all keyed references? I thought there was no constraint on the order of these.
section 4.4.2 - second last example is incorrect - it says "uddi:tempuri.com:keygenerator" is a legal derivedkey with a KSS of "keygenerator", but the text has explicitly forbidden KSS to be "keygenerator", so this is not a legal derivedkey. It IS a legal keygeneratorkey, though, isn't it? I suggest this be moved to the end of the examples, and labelled as a legal keygeneratorkey.
Tony Rogers
-----Original Message-----
From: Luc Clement [mailto:lclement@windows.microsoft.com]
Sent: Tue 12/08/2003 6:01
To: uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [uddi-spec] The v3.0.1 Specification has been posted for 30-day review

The v3.0.1 specification has been posted at the locations provided below. In accordance with Section 1.6 Specification Change Request and Errata Process (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/process/uddi-spec-tc-process-20021212.htm#_Toc27444262), this version of the spec is being submitted for a 30 day review period, during which time no changes should be made to either the errata or the marked up document. 


Any revision necessary as a result of feedback should be made and resubmitted for review; an additional 15 day review period should be allowed but may be waived depending on the nature of the changes. At the end of the review period, the TC Chairs will submit the errata and amended specification document (and schema and WSDL files) for vote as a Committee Specification.  Voting rules for this vote are the same as for approval of a TC Committee Specification, as documented in the OASIS TC Process.


HTML versions at:

Marked-up MS Word version at http://uddi.org/drafts/pubs/uddi-v3.0.1-20030809-markup.doc 


(Note: please let me know if you would like a PDF version of the revisions)


PDF version at http://uddi.org/drafts/pubs/uddi-v3.0.1-20030809.pdf


Schema files at:


WSDL files at:

Luc Clément
Co-chair, OASIS UDDI Spec TC

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]