uddi-spec message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [uddi-spec] elementFormDefault in uddi_v3policy.xsd
- From: Andrew Hately <hately@us.ibm.com>
- To: "John Colgrave" <colgrave@hursley.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:51:50 -0500
>The question I was asking was whether unqualified
was the correct value for
>elementFormDefault in the policy schema as the other schemas use qualified.
I believe the policy schema is written
correctly for elementFormDefault="unqualified" in it's present
form. The difference is not intentional and is likely due to the
schema tooling I was using at the time.
For consistency, there is no harm in
changing the default and updating the references to the types to be qualified
with a prefix inside the schema file.
Andrew Hately
IBM Austin
UDDI Development, Emerging Technologies
Lotus Notes: Andrew Hately/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Internet: hately@us.ibm.com
(512) 838-2866, t/l 678-2866
"John Colgrave"
<colgrave@hursley.ibm.com>
10/02/2003 02:27 AM
|
To
| "'Max Voskob'"
<max.voskob@paradise.net.nz>
|
cc
| "'UDDI Spec TC'"
<uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Subject
| RE: [uddi-spec] elementFormDefault
in uddi_v3policy.xsd |
|
Max,
The approach of removing the explicit specification of values that are
the
default value was agreed during the last call. If particular parsers
do not
handle defaults correctly then they should be fixed, and people can add
the
value explicitly in the meantime if they have to. I think the schemas
we
produce should be as clear and concise as we can make them. I suspect
that,
for example, if the schemas did not have these attributes specified unless
they really needed to be, then most of the questions about the values would
not arise.
I am aware that the default value is unqualified, I said so in my note.
The question I was asking was whether unqualified was the correct value
for
elementFormDefault in the policy schema as the other schemas use qualified.
John Colgrave
IBM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Max Voskob [mailto:max.voskob@paradise.net.nz]
> Sent: 01 October 2003 21:50
> To: 'UDDI Spec TC'
> Subject: Re: [uddi-spec] elementFormDefault in uddi_v3policy.xsd
>
> John,
>
> I've come accross a few situations when parsers did not use the default
> values correctly.
> If we make this change now it may impact on some existing implementations
> that try to use the new schemas.
> There is no harm in keeping the values specified even if they specify
the
> default values, I think.
>
> The default values for these attributes are unqualified (see
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#declare-schema)
>
> Cheers,
> Max
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Colgrave" <colgrave@hursley.ibm.com>
> To: "'UDDI Spec TC'" <uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:30 AM
> Subject: [uddi-spec] elementFormDefault in uddi_v3policy.xsd
>
>
> I am working my way through the changes to the 3.0.1 schemas and WSDL,
as
> discussed in the last call. One of the changes I suggested was
to remove
> the use of attributeFormDefault and elementFormDefault when the default
> value was specified. In looking through the schemas for such
occurrences,
> I
> noticed that in uddi_v3policy.xsd the elementFormDefault has a value
of
> unqualified, which is the default value, but I am not sure that it
is the
> correct value for elementFormDefault as that is specified as qualified
in
> the other schemas.
>
> Before I remove this attribute from this schema, can someone confirm
that
> unqualified is the correct value for this schema?
>
> John Colgrave
> IBM
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
of
> the
> OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-
> spec/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster
of
> the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-
> spec/members/leave_workgroup.php.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/uddi-spec/members/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]