[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Backwards Compatibility aspect of Taxonomies Requirement
I may have misunderstood the initial discussions of the Taxonomy requirements but I was expecting that for V4 we would provide first-class support for one (or a small number of) Taxonomy language(s) as an alternative to keyedReferences and categoryBags. What is the value of continuing to require a UDDI-specific representation, assuming that a standard taxonomy representation emerges, and what would the keyValue in a keyedReference be? I think an example would be a great help (to me at least). John Colgrave IBM
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]