These look rather good - I like the style. I only have a few
comments:
Executive White
Paper
First line, last para, p7 – “This
understanding of is reflected…” – looks like a word is missing
Figure 2, p10 – it may help the
reader understand if a second arrow is drawn showing that the contents of the
production registry are copied to the development registry (perhaps using
subscription?) to allow the development team to use production services during
testing. Or would development have their own copies of those services, running
against non-production databases?
Last sentence, first para, p12 –
XML digital signatures are used to guarantee the integrity (and authenticity) of
the data in the UDDI registry, not for authorisation. Authorisation and access
control is managed via proprietary (vendor specific) extensions to the V3
standard – it is a big part of the push for the next version of the
standard.
Technical White
Paper
Figure 1, p4 – technically, 2.0
was released “under OASIS aegis” – it was voted to standard shortly after UDDI
came into OASIS, even though virtually all of the work was done before joining
OASIS. Maybe just drop the last sentence against 3.0? If so, the same change
should be made in the Executive White Paper.
Tony Rogers
Co-chair,
OASIS UDDI Spec TC
Computer Associates
tony.rogers@ca.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Luc Clement
[mailto:luc.clement@systinet.com]
Sent: Tue 10-Aug-04 2:30
To: uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Rogers, Tony;
'Brent Sleeper'; 'Michael De Nicola'
Subject: [uddi-spec] FW: UDDI
white paper drafts
Please find attached the Executive and Technical
white paper drafts from Brent Sleepers. These are meant as replacement for the
set of dated documents we had on uddi.org.
Please indicate by a reply to me whether you are in a
position to review and by when.
Thanks -- Luc
Luc
Clément
Co-Chair OASIS UDDI
Spec TC
Systinet Corporation
Tel:
+1.617.395.6798
Here are drafts of the UDDI White Papers. Please review and
return comments to Brent Sleeper, copying me, by close of business next
Friday, August 20.
Luc: please distribute to the UDDI TC with the same deadline
for feedback.
George, Luc, and Karl: Are you available to discuss the
feedback with Brent on Monday morning (9:00amPT), August 23?
Thanks,
Mike DeNicola
Fujitsu
-----Original Message-----
From: Brent
Sleeper [mailto:bsleeper@stencilgroup.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 6:46 PM
To: Michael De Nicola
Cc: Karl Best
Subject: RE: UDDI white paper draft status
..............
Attached is a Zip archive of PDF and RTF versions of drafts
for the
UDDI v3 Executive and Technical white papers.
The RTF copies do not
include figures but are
otherwise identical.
I look forward to the group's questions, criticism, and other
feedback.
I have included a brief preamble in each
document with some questions
to consider as they are
read.
..............To help ensure the
revised draft meets all of your objectives, I would like to discuss the
group's comments with you on the phone at your
convenience; either the
week of the 16th or 23rd would
be ideal for me.
If the group can return feedback to me by Monday August 23, I
will be
able to return a revised draft to you by
August 31.
Best regards,
Brent Sleeper
_________________________________________
M. Brent Sleeper
Principal, The Stencil
Group
bsleeper@stencilgroup.com
(415) 710-6995
http://www.stencilgroup.com/