RE: [uddi-spec] Second objection - OASIS UDDI v3 Specification

["Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>]

Was there any attempt to raise this issue during the public review period?

 

For that matter, was there any attempt to raise this during the time that Version 3.0.0 and 3.0.1 were available?

 

Seems awfully late to be raising this.

 

Looks like we will have something to discuss on the call :-)

 

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Luc Clement [mailto:luc.clement@systinet.com]
Sent: Tue 01-Feb-05 14:07
To: uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc:
Subject: [uddi-spec] Second objection - OASIS UDDI v3 Specification

Please note the second objection

 

 

Luc Clément
Senior Program Manager, Systinet
Tel: +1.781.362.1330 / Cell: +1.978.793.2162 / www.systinet.com

 

 

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/voting/vote_details.php?id=675&voter_id=777

 

 

Ballot:  Approve UDDI v3.0.2 as an OASIS standard

Company:

Mitre Corporation

Vote:

No

Comment:

MITRE would like the TC to reconsider the current wording in the standard regarding Subscription APIs, a functionality that is being seriously considered by a MITRE customer. Specifically, the TC could consider the foll. wording change "If a UDDI registry must federate with other UDDI registries, then the registries SHOULD have at least one node that offers the Subscription API, otherwise the Subscription API is OPTIONAL".