[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsrp-pfb] PFB technical notes ready for public review
AIR is out for review. [AIR] http://tinyurl.com/78w49 [TAB] http://tinyurl.com/e43ep Quick glance ... does not provide guidance on UDDI key spaces. How stable are the tModelKeys used in the TN draft (and do they need to change based on the AIR? uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp:service_type uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp:v1_bindings uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp:producer_service_reference uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp:portlet_handle uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp:v1_service_description_porttype uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp:v1_markup_porttype uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp:v1_registration_porttype uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp:v1_portlet_management_porttype uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp:v1_service_description_binding_soap Paul At 12:51 PM 2005-02-17, Richard Jacob wrote: >Paul, > >we were trying to add the conventions we agreed on with the UDDI TC and >WSRP TC to the OASIS nameing guidelines document. >Unfortunatly we haven't been lucky in the past. >Due to some overcommitment on my side we lost some drive there. >I will pick these effort up again asap and try to get OASIS to add these >conventions. > >Luc, do you have some energy to drive this effort again with me? >The WSRP folks see some raising demand to get the tModels we defined in our >tech note registered in the UBR. >How about doing both things in parallel: register the tModels and try to >get the conventions section being added to the OASIS document. > >I also copied Bill Cox, who is the owner of the OASIS document. >Bill, can you help us here, please? >I will forward the original request from Luc and myself to you again for >convenience. > >Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards, > > Richard Jacob >______________________________________________________ >IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany >Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development >WSRP Standardization Technical Lead >Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888 >Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com > > > > Paul Denning > <pauld@mitre.org> > To > 02/17/2005 05:24 Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, > PM Luc Clement > <Luc.Clement@systinet.com>, > wsrp-pfb@lists.oasis-open.org > cc > "'Von Riegen, Claus'" > <claus.von.riegen@sap.com>, > "'Andrew Hately'" > <hately@us.ibm.com>, John > Colgrave/UK/IBM@IBMGB, "'Rob > Kochman'" <robko@microsoft.com>, > "'Rogers, Tony'" > <Tony.Rogers@ca.com> > Subject > RE: [wsrp-pfb] PFB technical notes > ready for public review > > > > > > > > > > >[1] http://uddi.org/tmodels.html > >The tModels for the WSRP-PFB TN have not been published yet at [1]. >Nor do the keyGenerator tModels discussed below appear on [1]. > >And they are not registered in the UBR (using v2 keys). >I have taken an interest lately in WSRP, and would like to discover various > >WSRP producers. > >The WSRP proxy portlet in Liferay Pro 3.2.0 comes configured with [3], >which seems to be down at the moment. > >[2] lists some others, some of which do not work. >BEA has one [4]. >Vignette has one [5]. >Sun's appears to work [6]. >Maybe there are others. > >But it would be nice if WSRP proxy portlets could do a UDDI lookup to find >the available WSRP producers. >This would require the tModels discussed in the draft WSRP-PFB-UDDI TN. > >What is the status of this? > >[2] >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/group_public/download.php/7507/wsrp-interop-producers.htm > >[3] http://portalstandards.oracle.com/wsrp/jaxrpc >[4] http://wsrp.bea.com/portal/producer?wsdl >[5] http://wsrpdemo.vignette.com:8080/producer/wsdl >[6] http://sunwsrp.dyndns.org/portal/wsrp/wsdl/default > >Paul > >At 08:08 AM 2004-11-02, Richard Jacob wrote: > > > > > >Luc, > > > >thanks for working this out. I copied the wsrp-pfb SC on this. > >I agree on this appoach, sounds good to me. > >There is one thing to notice: > >We talked about the oasis partition in the UBR a while ago with John and > >Claus (afair) and by that time we came out with uddi:oasis-open.org:<tc > >name> as the partititons. > >We're now adding the "committees" subpartition. > >In general I agree on following the oasis convention (this is used on the > >OASIS-Site only, right?). > > > >However, do we need the "committees" subpartition at all? > >The only advantage I see it brings us is the fact that keys having the >same > >name as a tc might be registered in the oasis-open.org partition. > >I see that having the subcommittees partition is a little bit cleaner. > > > >In our current UDDI TN we have chosen the first convention for our keys: > >"uddi:oasis-open.org:wsrp". > >If you intend to introduce the "committees" subpartition, please let us > >now, since we then need to change the V3 keys in our tech note (and thus > >regenerate the derived V2 keys). > >We intended to accept and finalize the tech note on our F2F next week. > >The change, or at least the change request for this must be done prior to > >this. > >To be clear: I (and hopefully speaking on behalf of our SC) am happy with > >either convention, but it is important for us timing wise to know which > >direction you intend to go as soon as possible. > > > >On the timing: when do you think we will be ready to go and have the >tModel > >keys in place? > > > >You can find all the keys we intend to register in our tech note: > >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp/wsrp-pfb/download.php/9 > 532/wsrp-pfb-uddi-tn-1.0-draft-11.pdf > > > > >Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards, > > > > Richard Jacob > >______________________________________________________ > >IBM Lab Boeblingen, Germany > >Dept.8288, WebSphere Portal Server Development > >WSRP Standardization Technical Lead > >Phone: ++49 7031 16-3469 - Fax: ++49 7031 16-4888 > >Email: mailto:richard.jacob@de.ibm.com > > > > > > > > "Luc Clement" > > <Luc.Clement@syst > > inet.com> >To > > Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM@IBMDE > > 10/30/2004 05:25 >cc > > PM "'Rogers, Tony'" > > <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>, John > > Colgrave/UK/IBM@IBMGB, "'Von > > Riegen, Claus'" > > <claus.von.riegen@sap.com>, "'Rob > > Kochman'" <robko@microsoft.com>, > > "'Andrew Hately'" > > <hately@us.ibm.com> > > >Subject > > RE: [wsrp-pfb] PFB technical notes > > ready for public review > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Richard, > > > >See attached email. Sorry for the delay - I hope to solidify this plan > >shortly. Once we agree on the plan (per attachement) you and I should > >approach OASIS to get this "blessed". Are you ok with this approach? > > > >Once this is one, we can ask the elected UBR operator to register the > >specific set of keys you need. Could you please provide me with that list > >of > >keys? > > > >Luc > > > >Luc Clément > >Co-Chair OASIS UDDI Spec TC > >Systinet > >Tel: +1.617.768.4268 > >www.systinet.com > > > > > >----- Message from "Luc Clement" <Luc.Clement@systinet.com> on Sat, 30 Oct > >2004 11:21:47 -0400 ----- > > > > To: "'John Colgrave'" <colgrave@uk.ibm.com>, "'Andrew Hately'" > > <hately@us.ibm.com>, "'Von Riegen, Claus'" > > <claus.von.riegen@sap.com>, "'Rob Kochman'" <robko@microsoft.com> > > > > cc: "'Rogers, Tony'" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com> > > > > Sub RE: OASIS keyGenerator > > jec > > t: > > > > > >John: > > > >This is how I'd like to deal with this - basically, we follow your > >suggestion: > > 1. we register a key generator for oasis-open.org; register a key > > generators for "committees"; and register key generators for each >TC > > as they need it. To start with we would create keys for the >following > > TC: > > UDDI Spec TC > > WSRP > > I propose the following name/address convention based on > > current the current OASIS convention: > > uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:<tc identifier> > > 2. To start with, we would register: > > 1. uddi:oasis-open.org:keygenerator (derived key: > > uuid:966812b7-f798-3cd0-bc23-a946d36270d6) > > 2. uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:keygenerator (derived key: > > uuid:61c808e5-8159-348a-9ab1-b0df93de48d3) > > 3. uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:uddi-spec:keygenerator > > (derived key: uuid:6852eca3-bcb2-3f32-b168-ca6c83d848c8) > > 4. uddi:oasis-open.org:committees:wsrp:keygenerator (derived > > key: uuid:c906ae88-26d0-33ec-9a41-861a4f35d108) > > > > Based on this I've prepared the list of keygenerator tModels > > that we should register - see attached. > > 3. We get one of the operators to register the following tModels - >I > > propose IBM but will let Claus/Andrew/Rob to figure out who should > > publish (and maintain the source file). > > > > 4. We post these keygenerators at http://uddi.org/tmodels.html > >Once we settle on this, we'll get approval from the TC and inform OASIS of > >the plan. > > > >Luc > > > > > >From: John Colgrave [mailto:colgrave@uk.ibm.com] > >Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 09:21 > >To: luc.clement@systinet.com > >Subject: OASIS keyGenerator > > > > > >Luc, > > > >There was an e-mail discussion about six months ago regarding registering >a > >keyGenerator for OASIS, with a key of uddi:oasis-open.org:keyGenerator. > >Has any progress been made with this? The WSRP folks are getting close to > >defining their keys and I imagine we will have to have this OASIS > >keyGenerator tModel in place first. > > > >Regards, > > > >John > >-------------------------------------------------- > >John Colgrave > >Architect, IBM WebSphere UDDI Registry[attachment > >"OASIS-keyGenerator-tModels.xml" deleted by Richard Jacob/Germany/IBM] > > > > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of > >the OASIS TC), go to > >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrp-pfb/members/leave_workg > roup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]