OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

uddi-spec message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [uddi-spec] Re: Action required: RE: [wsrp-pfb] Re: UDDI partition names convention

What is the status of this and the WSRP-PFD TN?

Some comments below.


At 04:27 AM 2005-09-02, Richard Jacob wrote:
The review/objection/comment period is over.
Therefore we consider the proposal below as adopted.

@Luc: Let's take the next steps in the process and proceed with the
Can you comment on the next admin steps?
We can also take this process offline.
It would be great if we could make this a done thing before our WSRP F2F in
the first week of October.
I greatly appreaciate your support and assistance.


We're unfortunatly stuck with this since October last year.
We need to publish the WSRP tModels into the UBR to make our WSRP UDDI
technote practically usable.
[<lc> Richard: don't be held back by the UBR publication - take this as a
given, we can make this happen as a matter of course. What we need to agree
on - which as far as I'm concerned as stated above, this is a "done thing"
- is the partition prefix.</lc>]

UBR is not UDDI v3.
I have always thought it was odd that
requires you to publish a tModel in UBR, but with v2 you can't assign the tModelKey.


and MUST conform to UDDI specification 3.0.2, section 4.4.
Key partitions can be requested by contacting the OASIS staff who will
handle the registration of these UDDI v3 key partitions.

And how do we contact them?
Seems like we need to update

Is UBR will not advance beyond beta for UDDIv3, OASIS should have its own UDDIv3 registry where these things can be published and discovered.

Mit freundlichen Gruessen / best regards,

        Richard Jacob

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]