Hi,
My preferred groups to work:
3) Type system base model
2) type
system language
8)
Aggregate Analytics
10)
Java binding
For the meeting time, I have no real
preference. All propositions works well for EST time
Face to face meeting: I prefer the
Text Analytics Summit on June in Boston.
Best,
Pascal
From: David
Ferrucci [mailto:ferrucci@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007
10:17 AM
To: uima@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: j.tsujii@manchester.ac.uk;
Sophia.ananiadou@manchester.ac.uk; carl.madson@sri.com;
kano@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp; nltngan@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Subject: [uima] Building
Sub-Groups -- Your Input Required
Hi,
On
the last call we decided to form small maybe 2-3 person subgroups to
"own" different elements of the specification going forward.
The
idea is that each sub-group would do a deep-dive on a proposed element of the
specification in the IBM paper (e.g., CAS, Type-System, Abstract interfaces
etc.).
The
initial task would be to critique the section, identify issues and make
recommendations on how to take it forward to a final form. The TC as a whole
would vote on the sub-groups' recommendations and action plans. The sub-groups
would then take on the task to implement the agreed-upon action plan.
Sub-groups
will have leads whose responsibility it will be to share evolving
comments/questions/issues as part of an email discussion with the whole TC.
This is a critical component of the plan since the biweekly meeting will NOT
suffice if everyone had to come up to speed on recommendations during the
calls.
Please
read the following sections in the paper (if you have not already) and send me
your preferences for leading and/or joining 2 or more of the following areas. I
think it is important to have non-IBM participation on all of these. Please
also note that some of these sections are more straightforward than others and
I imagine will take less time/effort.
1.
CAS Specification
2.
Type-system Language
3.
Type-System Base Model
4.
Behavioral Meta-Data Specification (challenging issues here)
5.
Processing Element Meta-data specification
6.
Abstract Interfaces
7.
WSDL Service Descriptions
8.
Aggregate Analytic Descriptor Specification
9.
SOAP Bindings
10.
Java Bindings (proposed as an appendix by TC but not in original paper)
(PLEASE
RESPOND BY MONDAY OF NEXT WEEK -- Thanks.)
Discussion
Topics (or what may be considered open issues) are discussed in section 7 of
the paper. These may turn into core specifications, or may more likely lead to
recommendations rather than core specifications. This section has a number of
sub-sections.They will require different treatment, any thoughts?
We
can decide on an approach for these at the next call.
Thanks,
Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------
David A. Ferrucci, PhD
Senior Manager, Semantic Analysis & Integration
Chief Architect, UIMA
IBM T.J. Watson
Research Center
19 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532
Tel: 914-784-7847, 8/863-7847
ferrucci@us.ibm.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ibm.com/research/uima