OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

uima message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [uima] Re: [CAS Specification Subgroup] Getting Started



Our intention was  to allow the freedom provided by the Regional Reference but to include "standard" annotation types in the base-type system to address interoperability issues.
I think its important to define certain base types exactly to encourage/support interoperability. At the same time I do not think we want to get into the business of defining base annotation types for every possible artifact representation. So I have argued we need both.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
David A. Ferrucci, PhD
Senior Manager, Semantic Analysis & Integration
Chief Architect,  UIMA
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
19 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY 10532
Tel: 914-784-7847, 8/863-7847
ferrucci@us.ibm.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.ibm.com/research/uima  



"Scott Songlin Piao" <scott.piao@manchester.ac.uk>

03/01/2007 07:06 AM

To
"Eric Nyberg" <ehn+@cs.cmu.edu>, "Sophia.ananiadou@manchester.ac.uk" <Sophia.ananiadou@manchester.ac.uk>, "tgoetz@de.ibm.com" <tgoetz@de.ibm.com>, "ehn@cs.cmu.edu" <ehn@cs.cmu.edu>, Ngan <nltngan@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, "carl.madson@sri.com" <carl.madson@sri.com>, "kano@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp" <kano@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, "j.tsujii@manchester.ac.uk" <j.tsujii@manchester.ac.uk>
cc
"uima@lists.oasis-open.org" <uima@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject
RE: [uima] Re: [CAS Specification Subgroup] Getting Started





Hi,

Here is my comment on the regional reference of Annotation type (section 5.1).

1) According to Fig. 3 (Sofa Reference and Regional Reference), the Annotation type itself does not have regional reference features, it only has sofa reference. The paragraph above Fig. 3 says that any subtype of the Annotation MAY define how the regional reference is implemented. Does it imply that, by definition, the Annotation is not necessarily linked to certain region of the data? This seems to conflict against the general definition of Annotation as a type linked to certain region.

2) By allowing the freedom for subtypes of Annotation to define the way the regional reference is implemented, it may result in specialized implementations of the regional reference, which may potentially cause problem for interoperability.

3) As have been mentioned in previous discussions already, the multi-region reference is an issue to be resolved.

Best regards

Scott Piao




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]