uima message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [uima] UIMA TC Final Comments DUE May 9th -- Action Required.
- From: Adam Lally <alally@us.ibm.com>
- To: uima@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 10:07:01 -0400
My comments after reading the spec through
again:
Filling in the fields on the title page:
* What do we list under
Related Work, if anything?
* We need to write an abstract.
* Does anyone else get
listed under Editor(s)?
We need to resolve the footnotes, which
mostly are editing notes to ourselves:
* Footnote 1, page 17:
Too informal, we could just replace with "as required by the
XMI specificaiton" in the text and leave it at that.
* Footnote 2 page 47: I
think this can stay.
* Footnote 3, page 24:
Decide if we want to state in the body of the text that configuraiton settings
should not affect behavioral metadata, then remove the footnote.
* Footnote 4, page 57:
We did not add anything to the behavioral metadata about whether
a PE can accept undefined types, as this footnote suggests. Do we
want to do that? I suggest not doing that at this point. We
can add somewhere (in the abstract interfaces maybe) that a PE MAY accept
a CAS that does not have a defined type system.
Appendix A - Acknowledgements: What
to do here?
Regards,
-Adam
_____________________________
Adam Lally
Senior Software Engineer
Semantic Analysis & Integration
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Hawthorne, NY, 10532
Tel: 914-784-7706, T/L: 863-7706
alally@us.ibm.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]