Re: [uiml-comment] Summary of issues raised by Takashi Endo and suggested UIML 4.0 changes

["Jo Vermeulen" <jo.vermeulen@uhasselt.be>]

On Dec 4, 2007 10:33 AM, <takashi.endou.zs@kyocera.jp> wrote:

> Mr. Vermeulen
>
> Thank you Jo Vermeulen.
>
> The point I would like to indicate is not whether there must be
> one unique top part.
>
> The point is that Listing 9 will not result in Listing 10.


Oh I see ...


>
> If we don't use the parametrization, Listing 9 is described as
> following.
> (I have found  Listing 9 misses an element "style".)


At first sight, I don't think that really matters since the style will be
inserted anyway (because we use "replace").


>
> <uiml>
>  <interface>
>    <structure>
>      <part id="id1" source="#tpl" how="replace">
>      </part>
>    </structure>
>  </interface>
>  <template id="tpl">
>    <part>
>      <part id="entry_copy" class="Entry"/>
>      <part id="btn_copy" class="Button">
>        <style> <!-- The original Listing 9 misses it -->
>          <property name="label">Click to copy</property>
>        </style> <!-- The original Listing 9 misses it -->
>      </part>
>    </part>
>  </template>
> </uiml>
>
> I think this results in the following listing when the template is
> inserted.
>
> <uiml>
>  <interface>
>    <structure>
>      <part id="id1">
>        <part id="id1_tpl_entry_copy" class="Entry"/>
>        <part id="id1_tpl_btn_copy" class="Button">
>          <style>
>            <property name="label">Click to copy</property>
>          </style>
>        </part>
>      </part>
>    </structure>
>  </interface>
> </uiml>
>
> The top part "id1" survives. And the FQIDs contain "id1_tpl_".
>

You are right in my opinion, the top part does survive.  I will update it.

Does everyone else agree?

-- Jo