Re: [uiml-comment] Summary of issues raised by Takashi Endo and suggested UIML 4.0 changes

["Jim Helms" <jhelms@gmail.com>]

On 12/7/07, Jo Vermeulen <jo.vermeulen@uhasselt.be> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 10:33 AM, <takashi.endou.zs@kyocera.jp> wrote:
<snip>
> >
> > <uiml>
> >  <interface>
> >    <structure>
> >      <part id="id1" source="#tpl" how="replace">
> >      </part>
> >    </structure>
> >  </interface>
> >  <template id="tpl">
> >    <part>
> >      <part id="entry_copy" class="Entry"/>
> >      <part id="btn_copy" class="Button">
> >        <style> <!-- The original Listing 9 misses it -->
> >          <property name="label">Click to copy</property>
> >        </style> <!-- The original Listing 9 misses it -->
> >      </part>
> >    </part>
> >  </template>
> > </uiml>
> >
> > I think this results in the following listing when the template is
> > inserted.
> >
> > <uiml>
> >  <interface>
> >    <structure>
> >      <part id="id1">
> >        <part id="id1_tpl_entry_copy" class="Entry"/>
> >        <part id="id1_tpl_btn_copy" class="Button">
> >          <style>
> >            <property name="label">Click to copy</property>
> >          </style>
> >        </part>
> >      </part>
> >    </structure>
> >  </interface>
> > </uiml>
> >
> > The top part "id1" survives. And the FQIDs contain "id1_tpl_".
> >
>
> You are right in my opinion, the top part does survive.  I will update it.
>
> Does everyone else agree?
>

I agree.  The placeholder ID is preserved and all children should get the FQID.

Thanks!
Jim