There is one thing left with the specification
which I forgot to do: When I constructed the DTD I had to make
minor changes in order to achieve a valid DTD,
which are not yet reflected in the DTD-fragments used to introduce
the elements. In other words, there is an
inconsistency between the correct DTD in the appendix and the
in the main part. I will correct this ASAP, latest
by end of this week.
WRT a voice meeting, I should be available all of
_/ Dipl. Inf. Robbie Schaefer _/ Phone: +49 5251
_/ Visual Interactive Systems _/ Fax: +49 5251
_/ C-LAB Fuerstenallee
_/ D-33102 Paderborn
_/ URL: http://www.c-lab.de
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 8:32
Subject: [uiml] Final version of the UIML
4.0 specification - reformatted to match the OASIS template.
Thanks to everyone
who took a look at the UIML 4.0 specification and provided feedback!
Attached is the latest version that addresses everyone's comments and adheres
to the current OASIS Specification template.
To answer Kris's
question, I have done an informal appraisal of the specification features and
have concluded that all of the additions to the language have (to the best of
my knowledge) been implemented somewhere (either in Harmonia's tools,
uiml.net, DSL,...). Perhaps a more formal examination could be
performed during the public review.
At this point I
would like to have this version of the specification approved by the committee
as a Committee Draft. To this end, what is your availability over the
next couple of weeks? I would like to meet via phone to hold the vote
and then submit it for Public Review!
Research and Development
P.O. Box 11282
Office: (540) 951-5900 x 205