Re: [uiml] Conformance section for the UIML specification.

[Kris Luyten <kris.luyten@uhasselt.be>]

On 18 May 2008, at 17:36, Jim Helms wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Mary has pointed out that the current specification doesn't include a
> Conformance section as described by the following paragraph from the
> TC process:
>
> "A specification that is approved by the TC at the Public Review
> Draft, Committee Specification or OASIS Standard level must include a
> separate section, listing a set of numbered conformance clauses, to
> which any implementation of the specification must adhere in order to
> claim conformance to the specification (or any optional portion
> thereof)."
>
> At the moment I think the only real conformance clause we have is that
> any implementation of the specification must adhere to the constraints
> and restrictions implied by the definitions for each element in the
> specification.  Does anyone have suggestions about what else should be
> included in this section?

Agreed with your proposal. I don't have any additional clauses.

Cheers,
Kris
--
Kris Luyten
Assistant Professor
Expertisecentrum voor Digitale Media - Hasselt University
Wetenschapspark 2, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
tel.: +32 (0)11 268411
email: kris.luyten@uhasselt.be
web: http://research.edm.uhasselt.be/kris