[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [unitsml] UnitsML: Information regrading AnIML
Peter I agree that we should allow one child element containers in UnitsML. Stuart On Apr 21, 2009, at 5:54 PM, Peter J. Linstrom wrote: > All, > > During the April teleconference I noted that > I would check on two things from the AnIML project. > Here are the results: > > 1.) Use of containers which only contain one > type of child element. > > I have found three cases where this is done > in the current AnIML draft. In all cases it > was possible that there could be a large > number of child elements, so one could readily > see the justification for the container. > > It is my opionion that the use of containers > which contain only one type of child is > reasonable in UnitsML since these containers > help organize the data and allow for future > additions. > > 2.) Determine the technology used to generate > documentation from the schema. > > The AnIML project was originally planning > to use a tool which generates documentation > based on the comment format used by Altova's > XMLSpy program. Recently there has been > concern that this format is not a standard > and the AnIML developers are looking at > other possible solutions. Unfortunately it > appears the XML schema does not define a > standard for structured documentation. > > Peter > ====================================================== > Peter J. Linstrom > NIST, Chemical and Biochemical Reference Data Division > Phone: (301) 975-5422 > ====================================================== > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]