OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

unitsml message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [unitsml] Three motions


All,

I vote in favor of all three motions.

Peter Linstrom

======================================================
Peter J. Linstrom
(301) 975-5422
NIST, Chemical and Biochemical Reference Data Division
======================================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Legrand, Karen [mailto:Karen.Legrand@iem.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 6:48 PM
> To: Weber, Martin S.; unitsml@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [unitsml] Three motions
> 
> I second all three of these motions.
> 
> Karen Legrand
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weber, Martin S. [mailto:martin.weber@nist.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 4:39 PM
> To: unitsml@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [unitsml] Three motions
> 
> Hello TC,
> [this message is to be recorded as part of the asynchronous portion of
> the January UnitsML OASIS TC meeting]
> 
> I do apologize for having these motions so late during the asynchronous
> portion of the TC meeting, but we might still get them through before
> the meeting ends tomorrow midnight.
> 
> So here we are (rationales below):
> 
> 1) I move that the "ItemVersionHistory" child element of the
> "CountedItem" element be moved behind the "ItemSymbol" element.
> 
> 2) I move that the "UnitVersionHistory" child element of the "Unit"
> element be moved behind the "QuantityReference" element.
> 
> 3) I move that if either or both of above motions get seconded and
> pass,
> we designate the resulting Schema as a new Committe Specification Draft
> (please keep in mind that, if this motion also gets seconded, we need a
> special majority vote, i.e., everybody needs to explicitely voice a
> "yes" or "no").
> 
> Rationale for 1):
> Bob and I have noticed that the ItemVersionHistory element is stuck
> between the ItemName and the ItemSymbol elements. Given that the
> encompassing structure is a sequence, this means that a UnitsML author
> has to go through this "hiccup" of designating a name, then entering
> the
> version history of the item (if present), and only then can designate a
> symbol for the counted item. I believe that grouping "name" and
> "symbol"
> together is more logical. This approach can also be seen in the Unit
> element (Name and Symbol are grouped together)
> 
> Rationale for 2):
> Unit's child elements also can be clustered such as: a) describing the
> unit itself, b) describing the unit's relation to other units and
> quantities and c) meta-data about the unit in question. Currently the
> UnitVersionHistory somewhat stands in the middle. When looking at the
> Quantity element for comparison, the QuantityVersionHistory follows the
> UnitReference element, leaving the following setup for the quantity: a)
> descriptive elements, b) elements describing the quantity's relation to
> units (UnitReference) followed by c) meta-data. I think that moving the
> UnitVersionHistory behind the QuantityReference would nicely mirror the
> setup of the Quantity element. (Keep in mind that the Unit's child
> elements also reside in a sequence, so order does matter).
> 
> Rationale for 3):
> Our current Committe Specification draft would remain standing out
> there
> even if we update the schema. To have the CSD reflect the latest
> changes, we need to vote another time on the schema. So if at least one
> of the above motions pass successfully, we should make this draft
> version the official CSD. And we still can do this during this meeting.
> 
> Apologies again & with regards,
> 
> -Martin
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]