OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

uoml-x-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [uoml-x-comment] Defects in PDF Version of UOML-1-v1.0

Dear Dennis,


Thank you very much for your comments.


1. OpenOffice.org 2.4.1 version issue:


I have downloaded the Openoffice.org 2.4.1 from http://zh.openoffice.org/new/zh_cn/downloads.html, named " OOo_2.4.1rc2_20080529_Win32Intel_install_zh-CN.exe" . Opened the UOML specification and then saved the file again; After I unzip the odt document, find out the mata.xml, it describes :"

xmlns:ooo="http://openoffice.org/2004/office" office:version="1.1">


  <meta:generator>OpenOffice.org/2.4$Win32 OpenOffice.org_project/680m17$Build-9310</meta:generator> "

I got confused about this as well. Please let me know how to create an odt file by Openoffice.org2.4.1 which can be identified as ODF 2.4.1.


  2. Table of Content problems:

I have  eliminated the duplicate by configuration of "Index edit" in the OpenOffice . There are .ODT, .PDF and .htm files of UOML CS generated, please have a check the attachment.



Please feel free to send you idea to me.






2008/9/6 Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
An update:

1. Screen shot.  The UOML-X-comment list did not accept the .png attachment.
I have included a .zip file containing the .png as an attachment to this
message.   I also placed the .png file here:

2. Table of Content problems.  I manually corrected the content.xml file in
the .odt package and forced OO.o 2.4.1 to regenerate the table of contents.
I was able to eliminate the duplicate entries.  There are other
  2.1 When the table of contents is regenerated using OO.o 2.4.1, the
sections 3 UOML Instructions and 4 Conformance are renumbered as 1 and 2.  I
do not know what makes the section numbering start over there.
  2.2 There are other formatting problems when an Update All is forced.

I have no useful thoughts at this point.

 - Dennis

Dennis E. Hamilton
NuovoDoc: Design for Document System Interoperability
mailto:Dennis.Hamilton@acm.org | gsm:+1-206.779.9430
http://NuovoDoc.com http://ODMA.info/dev/ http://nfoWorks.org

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamilton@acm.org]

Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 08:26
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org; 'UOML-X Comment'
Cc: 'Mary McRae'; 'allison shi'
Subject: RE: [uoml-x-comment] Defects in PDF Version of UOML-1-v1.0

Hello Yan Shi,

I have checked the OpenOffice.org 2.4.1 version of the committee
specification.  It is identified as ODF 1.1 as expected.

I also notice that the duplicate lines in the table of contents also appear
in this form of the committee specification.  I have included a screen
capture (.png file) that demonstrates the duplication.

I have inspected the .odt file.  The duplicate entries also appear in the
content.xml file in the ODF package.  Experimenting with OO.o 2.4.1 "Update
index/table" and "Update All" operations does not change anything.

 - Dennis

PS: I do not have any good idea how the duplication happens.  My thinking is
that the table of contents may have been created in a different computer
program.  Perhaps it can be regenerated there.

-----Original Message-----
From: allison shi [mailto:allison_shi@sursen.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 21:01
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: UOML-X Comment; Mary McRae
Subject: Re: [uoml-x-comment] Defects in PDF Version of UOML-1-v1.0

Hi Dennis,

Thanks for pointing out the defect of our TC's Specification, we are highly
appreciated it. Yes, you are right, this is because we used Redflag's odf
version as we just contacted them, and confirmed it.

Here attached is newly created uoml-part1-v1.0-cs01.odt, which uses

Mary, is it ok to reload this one to its proper position? Please let me know
what else we should do. Thanks.

Best rgds,

Yan Shi
Co-chair UOML-X TC

2008/9/5, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>:

       Although the PDF version of UOML part 1 v1.0 now under review is not
the authoritative version (not sure why), it is often the most-stable
version for reference by accurate page and line citations.

       There is a peculiar defect in the PDF file at

       In the table of contents of that PDF, a number of entries appear
twice.  This happens throughout the table of contents.  This appears to be a
defect in the OpenOffice.org 3.0 beta version that was used to produce the
PDF.  I encounter the same problem when I open the .odt version with
OpenOffice.org 2.4.1, ignore the ODF-version warning, and export as PDF.

[ ... ]

This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Unstructured Operation Markup Language eXtended (UOML-X) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: uoml-x-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: uoml-x-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: uoml-x-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uoml-x-comment/
Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=uoml-x


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]