[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Comments on the Public Review of UOML Part 1 v1.0 Errata
Below are my comments to the errata document: http://docs.oasis-open.org/uoml-x/v1.0/errata/cd/uoml-part1-v1.0-errata.pdf
Martin. -------- According to the TC Process “"Errata" means
a set of changes or proposed changes to a specification that are not
Substantive Changes.” and “"Substantive
Change" is a change to a specification that would require
a compliant application or implementation to be modified or rewritten in order
to remain compliant.” Given this definition I do not understand how the TC
considers the following to be non-substantive changes: Changes labelled 50, 51, 53, 58, 67, 68, 78: These
changes do not alter the xsd, but add new constraints to permissible values of
properties e.g. change page width from a float to a positive float. Thus
documents written to the current OASIS Standard may now be invalid with these
changes if they use values outside those defined in the errata. Change labelled 83: This is a breaking xsd change. Documents
written to the current OASIS Standard may now be invalid with this change. Change labelled 86: The addition of a RELAX-NG
representation of the xsd schema is a new feature that was not in the OASIS
Standard. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]