[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [uoml] uoml sample document
Then it would look something like this (below or attached) Quoting stephen.green@systml.co.uk: > Thanks Alex > > Apologies that I didn't quite realise the purpose of the documents > as being to consider the format rather than the content. > > Yes the format does appear to be along the correct lines, although > there would probably need to be additions such as, at the least - > > OASIS logo > Title - such as 'Document Operation Language (UOML) 1.0' > > Publication Date > Document identifier - could be same as the filename if it obeys the > OASIS rules > Editorial Status - 'Draft' > Location (perhaps include this later when one is established) > Editors > Contributors > > <rest of document as in the samples sent on the 14th Feb> > > Normative References (if there are any, perhaps ODF, W3C XML Schema, XML ) > Non-Normative References (if there are any - perhaps ODF would be here) > Notices (OASIS copyright) > > I am also reminded that it would seem to be ideal if there > were no spaces in the filename but if there are spaces then > no double spaces. Maybe an file name without spaces like > 'wd-UOML-0-1.odt' might be ideal, or 'wd-UOML-1.0.odt' but > I think it best to avoid '.' except for extensions. > > I hope these comments are more relevant. The document samples > have a good structure as OASIS specification drafts, I think. > > All the best > > Stephen Green > > > > > > Quoting Wang Donglin <dlwang@sursen.com>: > >> Thanks Green. >> Xu Guo has given the .odt file format for the sample schedma, TOC >> and instroduction in 14th Feb. Pine converted to PDF in 27th Feb. >> We need your comment to these documents. After confirmation of >> sample, we will provide the whole specification according to the >> style of sample. >> >> -Alex >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]