Re: [uoml] uoml sample document

[stephen.green@systml.co.uk]

I notice that the .odt resulting from using the
required .ott template, misses out the OASIS logo
when downloaded from
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uoml/200703/bin00001.bin
and openned in Open Office 2.0

This of course will need to be fixed, plus there will
need to be namespace(s) and other such things added to
that prototype.

All the best

Steve


Quoting stephen.green@systml.co.uk:

> Apologies, Mary, I was somewhat amiss there.
>
> In this case then my prototype changes to the attached update
>
> All the best
>
> Stephen Green
>
>
> Quoting Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>>  I posted a message the other day but maybe it was missed? Please see:
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/uoml/200702/msg00019.html
>> which I've copied the text below for easy reference. OASIS requires  
>>    that all TC specifications conform to the OASIS
>> Templates and adhere to our Policies and rules.
>>
>>  The OASIS Templates can be found at
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/.
>> The informative reference for all formats is the XHTML User Guide
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateGuidelines.html
>> which contains links to the actual requirements in the Naming and    
>>  Metadata Guidelines documents. Templates are provided
>> for authoring in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, and XHTML. A DocBook    
>>  suite is also available, but has not been updated to
>> match the
>> latest metadata requirements. Please note that according to the     
>> OASIS TC Process all approved committee work must be
>> available in the editable source, as well as PDF and XHTML.
>>
>>  If you need any assistance with the templates or have questions,    
>>  I'm more than happy to help.
>>
>>  Regards,
>>
>> Mary
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: stephen.green@systml.co.uk [mailto:stephen.green@systml.co.uk]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 5:54 PM
>>> To: uoml@lists.oasis-open.org
>>> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [uoml] uoml sample document
>>>
>>> Then it would look something like this (below or attached)
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting stephen.green@systml.co.uk:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Alex
>>>>
>>>> Apologies that I didn't quite realise the purpose of the
>>> documents as
>>>> being to consider the format rather than the content.
>>>>
>>>> Yes the format does appear to be along the correct lines, although
>>>> there would probably need to be additions such as, at the least -
>>>>
>>>> OASIS logo
>>>> Title - such as 'Document Operation Language (UOML) 1.0'
>>>>
>>>> Publication Date
>>>> Document identifier  - could be same as the filename if it
>>> obeys the
>>>> OASIS rules Editorial Status - 'Draft'
>>>> Location (perhaps include this later when one is
>>> established) Editors
>>>> Contributors
>>>>
>>>> <rest of document as in the samples sent on the 14th Feb>
>>>>
>>>> Normative References  (if there are any, perhaps ODF, W3C
>>> XML Schema,
>>>> XML ) Non-Normative References  (if there are any - perhaps
>>> ODF would
>>>> be here) Notices (OASIS copyright)
>>>>
>>>> I am also reminded that it would seem to be ideal if there were no
>>>> spaces in the filename but if there are spaces then no
>>> double spaces.
>>>> Maybe an file name without spaces like 'wd-UOML-0-1.odt' might be
>>>> ideal, or 'wd-UOML-1.0.odt' but I think it best to avoid '.' except
>>>> for extensions.
>>>>
>>>> I hope these comments are more relevant. The document
>>> samples have a
>>>> good structure as OASIS specification drafts, I think.
>>>>
>>>> All the best
>>>>
>>>> Stephen Green
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Wang Donglin <dlwang@sursen.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Green.
>>>>> Xu Guo has given the .odt file format for the sample
>>> schedma, TOC
>>>>> and instroduction in 14th Feb. Pine converted to PDF in
>>> 27th Feb.
>>>>> We  need your comment to these documents. After confirmation of
>>>>> sample,  we will provide the whole specification according
>>> to the
>>>>> style of  sample.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>