Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH 1/1] ccw: ccw payload description

[Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com>]

Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:27:26 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:25:31PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Sounds good, let's do that. And let's add a comment
>> where we define leXX.
>
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio/201401/msg00089.html adds
> definitions for leXX types, among other things.

Yes, I assume that will pass at the next meeting, then we can extend
it.  It's actually hard to do in a meaningful way.  Here's my attempt:

\item[le16, le32, le64] An unsigend integer of the specified length in bits,
in little-endian byte order.  (Those implementing legacy compatibility
should be aware that most little-endian fields were native-endian in
earlier drafts: see \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device /
Feature Bits / Legacy Interface: A Note on transitions from earlier
drafts}).

Thoughts?
Rusty.