Re: [virtio] Feedback for CSPRD03

[Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>]

On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 20:25 +0100, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I think the only things left are:
> 
> > * 3.1.2 "Legacy devices do not support the FEATURES_OK status bit, and
> > thus did not have a graceful way for the device to indicate
> > unsupported
> > feature combinations. It also did not provide a clear mechanism to
> > end feature negotiation, which meant that devices finalized features
> > on
> > first-use, and no features could be introduced which radically changed
> > the initial operation of the device."
> >
> > This has mixed tenses ("do not"/"did not"/"which meant"). Probably
> > should all be present tense, since all the statements are still true
> > of
> > legacy devices now as well as in the past.

https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-112

> > * 4.2 "Therefore most of operations like..."
> >
> > Should be "Therefore most operations including"

The second thing should be actually included in the MMIO fix, will add.

Paweł