[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] used ring: define the meaning and requirements of the len field.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:35:12AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes: > > So, if you think we should include this in 1.0 cs03, then you > > need to vote no on the cs03 ballot, and we'll > > redo a draft with these changes applied. > > On balance, I think that is necessary. I hate to think of an > implementation getting this wrong. > > I encourage others to change their votes to No too. > > Thanks, > Rusty. OK, I closed the ballot, no point it dragging it out more.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]