[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH] Update VIRTIO_F_EVENT_IDX throughout
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:27:55 -0700 Joel Nider <joel@nider.org> wrote: > On 2021-04-30 4:27 a.m., Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:10:16 -0700 > > Joel Nider <joel@nider.org> wrote: > >> - \item[VIRTIO_F_RING_EVENT_IDX(29)] This feature enables the \field{used_event} > >> + \item[VIRTIO_F_EVENT_IDX(29)] This feature enables the \field{used_event} > > Hm. The VIRTIO_F_RING_ version actually matches well with > > VIRTIO_F_RING_INDIRECT_DESC and VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED. While the latter > > is used consistently throughout the spec, we seem to use > > VIRTIO_F_INDIRECT_DESC in other places. For added variety, Linux and > > QEMU use VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC and VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX (but > > VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED.) > Clearly all of these flags apply to the v-rings - I don't think > including 'RING' to makes it any clearer. So in the interest of > readability, I would opt for the shorter flag names (more likely to fit > in a 80-char line). Linux (and the other OSes and hypervisors) will > eventually fall in line, once the spec is consistent. Not so sure about implementations changing their terms, but I don't think it's of much consequence. > > We should be consistent within the spec, so I'd vote for using the > > VIRTIO_F_RING_ versions everywhere here. (The Linux/QEMU variants are > > still easily recognizable, so there's actually not much potential for > > confusion.) The only downside is that this would mean more changes. > I fully support being consistent everywhere in the spec - that is my > primary concern. I noticed that over time, the flag name seems to be > gravitating towards the VIRTIO_F_EVENT_IDX (all places in section 2 > already use this name), so that's why I just changed the last two places > that are not consistent. Truly, I will be happy once they are all the > same (one way or the other). I have no strong preference for keeping the 'RING' particle, the main issue is consistency. In any case, we should also clean up INDIRECT_DESC.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]