virtio-comment message

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] virtio-blk: fix virtqueues accounting

From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>, mst@redhat.com, virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:20:49 +0200

On Wed, Jul 21 2021, Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> wrote:

> Virtqueue index is zero based, thus virtqueue (N-1) refers to requestqN.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  content.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>

We had an issue for a similar fix for virtio-net, so do we want to use
issue+voting here as well, or would that be overkill? I'm inclined to do
this as an editorial update.

References:
- [PATCH 1/1] virtio-blk: fix virtqueues accounting
  - From: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>