[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-snd: add support for audio controls
On Tue, Apr 20 2021, Anton Yakovlev <anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com> wrote: > This patch extends the virtio sound device specification by adding > support for audio controls. Audio controls can be used to set the volume > level, mute/unmute the audio signal, switch different modes/states of > the virtual sound device, etc. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Yakovlev <anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com> > --- > conformance.tex | 5 + > virtio-sound.tex | 374 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 378 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > @@ -50,6 +53,7 @@ \subsection{Device Configuration Layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Sound Device / > le32 jacks; > le32 streams; > le32 chmaps; > + le32 controls; > }; > \end{lstlisting} > > @@ -62,6 +66,9 @@ \subsection{Device Configuration Layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Sound Device / > PCM streams. > \item[\field{chmaps}] (driver-read-only) indicates a total number of all available > channel maps. > +\item[\field{controls}] (driver-read-only) indicates a total number of all available > +control elements if VIRTIO_SND_F_CTLS has been negotiated. While the driver is not supposed to read this if the feature has not been negotiated, do we also want to add a normative statement about what the device is supposed to do in this case? Does the field always exist? > + > \end{description} > > \subsection{Device Initialization} Does anyone familiar with virtio-snd want to take a look at this update?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]