OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-rpmb: fix the description for multi-block reads


On Mon, Aug 02 2021, Alex BennÃe <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:

> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 22 2021, Alex BennÃe <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Previously the text said we fail if block count is set to 1 despite
>>> language elsewhere in the text referring to:
>>>
>>>   "For RPMB read request, one virtio buffer including request command
>>>   and the subsequent [block_count] virtio buffers for response data
>>>   are placed in the queue."
>>>
>>> and the existence of both max_wr_cnt and max_rd_cnt configuration
>>> variables certainly implying devices should be able to handle
>>> multi-block reads just like writes.
>>>
>>> Fix the description as well as format the steps as an enumerated list
>>> to match the style of the previous section describing write handling.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex BennÃe <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  virtio-rpmb.tex | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> Do you want to request a vote for this?
>
> Sure - I think it's a clarification rather than a "new" feature but
> whatever is needed to get it merged ;-)

Yes, I think it is slightly over the line of things I would merge as an
editorial update, so please open a github issue.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]