[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-rpmb: fix the description for multi-block reads
On Mon, Aug 02 2021, Alex BennÃe <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote: > Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Jul 22 2021, Alex BennÃe <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> Previously the text said we fail if block count is set to 1 despite >>> language elsewhere in the text referring to: >>> >>> "For RPMB read request, one virtio buffer including request command >>> and the subsequent [block_count] virtio buffers for response data >>> are placed in the queue." >>> >>> and the existence of both max_wr_cnt and max_rd_cnt configuration >>> variables certainly implying devices should be able to handle >>> multi-block reads just like writes. >>> >>> Fix the description as well as format the steps as an enumerated list >>> to match the style of the previous section describing write handling. >>> >>> Reported-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@linaro.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Alex BennÃe <alex.bennee@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> virtio-rpmb.tex | 24 +++++++++++++----------- >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> Do you want to request a vote for this? > > Sure - I think it's a clarification rather than a "new" feature but > whatever is needed to get it merged ;-) Yes, I think it is slightly over the line of things I would merge as an editorial update, so please open a github issue.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]