Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix reserved Feature bits numbering

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Sun, Aug 01 2021, Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> wrote:

> This should have been updated during VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA and
> VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA standartization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  content.tex | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 5c70a3c..e9a32fa 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature B
>  \begin{description}
>  \item[0 to 23] Feature bits for the specific device type
>  
> -\item[24 to 37] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and
> +\item[24 to 39] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and
>    feature negotiation mechanisms

I'm wondering whether we should do s/reserved/used/ here?

>  
> -\item[38 and above] Feature bits reserved for future extensions.
> +\item[40 and above] Feature bits reserved for future extensions.
>  \end{description}
>  
>  \begin{note}