OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] virtio-blk: add secure erase feature to specification


On Wed, Dec 08 2021, yadong.qi@intel.com wrote:

> From: Yadong Qi <yadong.qi@intel.com>
>
> There are user requests to use the Linux BLKSECDISCARD ioctl on
> virtio-blk device. A secure discard is the same as a regular discard
> except that all copies of the discarded blocks that were possibly
> created by garbage collection must also be erased. This requires
> support from the device. And "secure erase" is more commonly used
> in industry to name this feature. Hence in this proposal, extend
> virtio-blk protocol to support secure erase command.
>
> Introduced new feature flag and command type:
>     VIRTIO_BLK_F_SECURE_ERASE
>     VIRTIO_BLK_T_SECURE_ERASE
>
> This feature is a passthrough feature on backend because it is hard
> to emulate a secure erase. So virtio-blk will report this feature
> to guest OS if backend device support such kind of feature. And
> when guest OS issues a secure erase command, backend driver will
> passthrough the command to host device blocks.
>
> Introduced new fields in virtio_blk_config for secure erase commands:
> struct virtio_blk_config {
>     ...
>     max_secure_erase_sectors;
>     max_secure_erase_seg;
>     secure_erase_sector_alignment;
> };
>
> Signed-off-by: Yadong Qi <yadong.qi@intel.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - add separated queue limits for secure discard.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - reword "secure discard" to "secure erase".
> - adjust offset of new fields
>
> v3 -> v4
> - unify the wording to "secure erase"
>
> v4 -> v5
> - fix typo
> - adjust position of changelog
>
> ---
>  content.tex | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Looks good to me from a purely spec point of view.

If nobody else has any comments, can you please open a github issue for
that? (https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec#use-of-github-issues)



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]