[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix reserved Feature bits numbering
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 04:30:00PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > On 12/30/2021 4:27 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 02:24:46PM +0000, Max Gurtovoy wrote: > > > Hi MST/Cornelia, > > > Can you please update on the status of this patch ? > > > It's open for few months and I'm wondering if there is something wrong with it ? > > Hmm. Is there a git issue for this? > > Not that I'm aware of. Who should open it ? Please do if possible. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > > > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 5:40 PM > > > To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> > > > Cc: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>; virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org; stefanha@redhat.com; eperezma@redhat.com; Oren Duer <oren@nvidia.com> > > > Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix reserved Feature bits numbering > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:48:36AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 12 2021, Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 8/10/2021 9:44 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 01 2021, Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > This should have been updated during VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA > > > > > > > and VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA standartization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > content.tex | 4 ++-- > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex index 5c70a3c..e9a32fa > > > > > > > 100644 > > > > > > > --- a/content.tex > > > > > > > +++ b/content.tex > > > > > > > @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature B > > > > > > > \begin{description} > > > > > > > \item[0 to 23] Feature bits for the specific device type > > > > > > > -\item[24 to 37] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > +\item[24 to 39] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue > > > > > > > +and > > > > > > > feature negotiation mechanisms > > > > > > I'm wondering whether we should do s/reserved/used/ here? > > > > > I'm just fixing a bug here. You can take this patch and create > > > > > another one with the above suggestion on top. > > > > > > > > > > I'm ok with your suggestion. > > > > So... any opinions on whether this should get a proper vote? [I won't > > > > be able to handle that in the next weeks. Michael?] > > > > > > Feature bit numbering is an important enough matter that I'd say let's have an issue for this please, and I will do a ballot. > > > > > > > > > > -\item[38 and above] Feature bits reserved for future extensions. > > > > > > > +\item[40 and above] Feature bits reserved for future extensions. > > > > > > > \end{description} > > > > > > > \begin{note}
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]