[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [PATCH v10 0/3] virtio-vsock: SOCK_SEQPACKET description
v9: https://markmail.org/message/4s6kfbeblxw4vzk4 Linux kernel and QEMU already merged SOCK_SEQPACKET support, so I'm resending Arseny's patches to have consistent virtio-spec and implementation. I added patch 2, following the discussion about F_STREAM feature bit: https://markmail.org/message/aoaspjy2jhidwbuo#query:+page:1+mid:obw54zzikgqimhjk+state:results About patch 2, the vhost-vsock device in the Linux kernel doesn't set bit 0 (F_STREAM), so at this point I don't know if it's better to use a negative feature flag (e.g. F_NO_STREAM) or we go for F_STREAM and send a patch to linux-stable (and QEMU?) to solve this issue. Thanks, Stefano Arseny Krasnov (2): virtio-vsock: use C style defines for constants virtio-vsock: SOCK_SEQPACKET description Stefano Garzarella (1): virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_STREAM feature bit virtio-vsock.tex | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) -- 2.31.1
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]