Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH V3 RESEND 1/4] Introduce virito transport virtqueue

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 5:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 04:36:43PM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +A device that offers feature bit VIRTIO_F_TRANSPT_VQ and a transport virtqueue is a management device.
> > > > +It processes the commands through the transport virtqueue commands.
> > > I think we need to be verbose here, e.g what did those transport
> > > virtqueue commands do? What's the relationship between management
> > > device and managed device?
> > I will add an overview of the transport virtqueue commands here, and a
> > description of the relationship in the "managed device" section.
>
> Transport is fine but management of devices is clearly something
> nvidia's patches do. So I think it's best to reuse the concept of device
> groups for this, from Max's patchset. Let's not replicate that work at
> least. I promised Max to help a bit with wording so I'll soon send a
> revision of his patchset, the generic part about device group
> from which you should be able to reuse.

I wonder if "parent/child" makes any more sense than "management/managed" here?

Thanks

>
> --
> MST
>