[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] transport-pci: Introduce virtio extended capability
On Tue, Apr 04 2023, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 09:54:55AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 04 2023, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 01:58:31AM +0300, Parav Pandit wrote: >> >> PCI device configuration space for capabilities is limited to only 192 >> >> bytes shared by many PCI capabilities of generic PCI device and virtio >> >> specific. >> >> >> >> Hence, introduce virtio extended capability that uses PCI Express >> >> extended capability. >> >> Subsequent patch uses this virtio extended capability. >> >> >> >> Co-developed-by: Satananda Burla <sburla@marvell.com> >> > >> > What does it "Co-developed-by" mean exactly that Signed-off-by >> > does not? >> >> AIUI, "Co-developed-by:" is more akin to a second "Author:", i.e. to >> give attribution. (Linux kernel rules actually state that any >> "Co-developed-by:" must be followed by a "Signed-off-by:" for that >> author, but we don't really do DCO here, the S-o-b is more of a >> convention.) > > > Actually, we might want to generally, to signify agreement to the IPR. > How about adding this to our rules? But in this case Satananda Burla is > a TC member so yes, no problem. Adding a s-o-b requirement is not a bad idea... do you want to propose an update?
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]