OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: virtio-sound: release control request clarification

Hi Matias,

On 18.10.2023 22:30, Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen wrote:
Hello Anton,

thanks for the response. I added some inline comments.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:06:05AM +0900, Anton Yakovlev wrote:
Hi Matias,

On 18.10.2023 00:19, Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen wrote:

This email is to clarify the VirtIO specification regarding the RELEASE
control request. Section [1] states the following device
requirements for the RELEASE control request:
1. The device MUST complete all pending I/O messages for the specified
stream ID.
2. The device MUST NOT complete the control request while there are
pending I/O messages for the specified stream ID.

The 1) requirement does not indicate what "complete" means. Does it mean
that the pending I/O messages in the tx queue shall be outputted in the
host, i.e., consumed by the audio backend? Or, completion means simply
to put the requests in the used-ring without consuming them?

Here "to complete" means moving the buffers to the used list in vring.
Technically, the specification only requires that the device "return" all
referenced DMA memory to the guest before completing the RELEASE control
request. What the device actually does with these I/O messages is
implementation dependent and is not within the scope of the specification.

Thank you, I got it. If I correctly understand you, after RELEASE is
issued, the specs specify only that the device should "return" all
buffers or "complete" them. Device implementations MAY or MAY NOT
playback them. In other words, the specification does not specify if
consumption should occur. I had interpreted this to mean that the guest
intended to output those buffers, leaving the device implementation with
no option but to do so.

Regarding 2), I interpret it as "the device shall wait until all I/O
messages are proceeded to complete the RELEASE control request".

...you can do this way if you really need to.

Currently, the kernel driver seems not expecting such a delay when the
RELEASE command is sent. If I understand correctly, the kernel driver
first sends the RELEASE command and waits a fixed amount of time until
the device can process it. Then, the driver waits a fixed amount of time
until all pending IO messages are completed. If the device follows the
specification and waits until all messages IO are completed to issue the
completion of the RELEASE command, the kernel driver may timeout. The
time to complete N IO messages in the TX queue could be proportional
with the number of pending messages.

The default timeout for control requests in the ALSA driver is 1 second. In
theory, this time should be enough to completely reproduce/fill the 500ms
buffer, and complete all requests, including the RELEASE control request. If
the device fails to do this, then most likely there are some problems with the

Thanks for clarifying. Sorry to repeat myself, the point I want to make
is that the virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() function that sends the RELEASE
control request uses virtsnd_ctl_msg_send_sync(). Message timeouts are
set up by the "msg_timeout_ms" module parameter. The timeout is the same
as for other control requests, such as SET_PARAM and PREPARE, but these
commands do not require flushing a queue, so I wondered how the timeout
could be the same.

In general, I don't think it's possible to scale/adjust the timeout value for
any of the control requests at runtime. You pointed only at the RELEASE
request, but depending on the device implementation, other requests may also
take an unpredictable amount of time. For example, if the device communicates
with an audio server over the network.

Therefore, in order not to overcomplicate things, a single more or less
reasonable default value was chosen. Which is also suitable for RELEASE (see
my thoughts above).

Best regards,

In our device implementation [2], RELEASE is handled as follows:
- Drop all messages in the TX queue without outputting in the host.
- Complete the RELEASE control request.

This seems to be working, however, I can observe that sometimes there
are still requests in the TX queue when we get RELEASE. Those requests
are never reproduced in the host.

My questions are:
- In the specification, should we modify it to clarify that all pending
    IO messages in the device are discarded during RELEASE, that is, not
    output to the host, but signaled to the guest as completed?

No, we shouldn't. See comment above.

- According to the specification, should the driver wait in RELEASE an
    amount of time proportional to the number of periods yet to be

This is purely a matter of driver implementation. It is possible to implement
the driver without timeouts, but this would be a bad idea. Because bugs in the
device could lead to an infinite wait in the kernel.

I agree, thanks.


Best regards,

Thanks, Matias.


Anton Yakovlev
Senior Software Engineer

OpenSynergy GmbH
Rotherstr. 20, 10245 Berlin

This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://ddec1-0-en-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=https%3a%2f%2flists.oasis%2dopen.org%2farchives%2fvirtio%2dcomment%2f&umid=d5297ffc-9da6-41eb-a09f-b57cd7282232&auth=53c7c7de28b92dfd96e93d9dd61a23e634d2fbec-a481d373f80a6c1b5882e1f0170a0687329391b1
Feedback License: https://ddec1-0-en-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.oasis%2dopen.org%2fwho%2fipr%2ffeedback%5flicense.pdf&umid=d5297ffc-9da6-41eb-a09f-b57cd7282232&auth=53c7c7de28b92dfd96e93d9dd61a23e634d2fbec-9797dad096ce101e2ddeccc4601649f954e89c09
List Guidelines: https://ddec1-0-en-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.oasis%2dopen.org%2fpolicies%2dguidelines%2fmailing%2dlists&umid=d5297ffc-9da6-41eb-a09f-b57cd7282232&auth=53c7c7de28b92dfd96e93d9dd61a23e634d2fbec-e529fd6878ce2da5bc6d951687d9f90e34808b1b
Committee: https://ddec1-0-en-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.oasis%2dopen.org%2fcommittees%2fvirtio%2f&umid=d5297ffc-9da6-41eb-a09f-b57cd7282232&auth=53c7c7de28b92dfd96e93d9dd61a23e634d2fbec-afc2604472b6094aee00bdd9a5aa0a65d12f7e19
Join OASIS: https://ddec1-0-en-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.oasis%2dopen.org%2fjoin%2f&umid=d5297ffc-9da6-41eb-a09f-b57cd7282232&auth=53c7c7de28b92dfd96e93d9dd61a23e634d2fbec-cae044bc06deaf94443835e5f72f10909d5abeec

Anton Yakovlev
Senior Software Engineer

OpenSynergy GmbH
Rotherstr. 20, 10245 Berlin

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]