[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-can: define out of rage can-id
Hello, On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 7:15âPM Harald Mommer <harald.mommer@opensynergy.com> wrote: > > > On 28.02.24 17:15, Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen wrote: > > This commit explains when a message is out of range. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <mvaralar@redhat.com> > > --- > > * This patch applies on top of virtio-1.4, which has not been released > > yet. > > --- > > device-types/can/description.tex | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/device-types/can/description.tex b/device-types/can/description.tex > > index 2511d9c..0a5cf02 100644 > > --- a/device-types/can/description.tex > > +++ b/device-types/can/description.tex > > @@ -191,6 +191,9 @@ \subsubsection{Controller Mode}\label{sec:Device Types / CAN Device / Device Ope > > invalid state with VIRTIO_CAN_RESULT_NOT_OK in \field{result} and MUST > > NOT schedule the message for transmission. > > > > +Note that a message is out of range when a standard frame uses more than 11 > > +bits of can-id or when an extended frame uses more than 29 bits. > > > "_" and "-" and missing \field{}: It's "\field{can_id}" in the paragraph > above. > > => "can-id" => "\field{can_id}" > > Looked through the spec. I did at least not totally forget to mention > the 11 bits for standard CAN and the 29 bits for extended CAN (line > 28ff). But could have been expressed more clearly, the note makes it > clear now. > Thanks! I will add those changes in v1. Matias
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]