[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] can we do better than text?
> > Several TCs are using DocBook XML to author their specs if you want to > look at > > that approach. And the CMIS TC used Tex to publish their specification > (see > > http://docs.oasis-open.org/cmis/CMIS/v1.1/CMIS-v1.1.html). > > > > /chet OK the problem was really section numbers and footnotes and cross-references to them. So I've written a perl script to fix them up. Usage: perl fix-numbers.pl < old > new The script recognizes number followed by dot as a section number, and number in square brackets as a footnote number. It also requires that section headings are followed by -------- or =========. It fixes up numbers to be consequitive, and updates all references it can find. Thus, to add a new section, add it with correct depth but arbitrary unique numbers. then run script to give it a sane number. Same for a new footnote. There could be false-positives, but one can work around them by teaking input format, or just do git add -p and not commit them. Using this script, I've updated the spec to numbers are now in order. Enjoy! -- MST
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]