Re: [virtio] [PATCH 2/5] feedback: drop use of "we"

[Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>]

On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:10:23 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> explicitly say driver/device or use passive form
> as appropriate.
> 
> Cc: Arun Subbarao <asubbarao@lnxw.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
>  content.tex | 18 ++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 

> @@ -663,12 +664,12 @@ device), so we keep a counter of how many we've added:
>  \subsubsection{Updating The Index Field}\label{sec:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Operation / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Updating The Index Field}
> 
>  Once the index field of the virtqueue is updated, the device will
> -be able to access the descriptor chains we've created and the
> +be able to access the descriptor chains that driver created and the

s/driver/the driver/ ?

(also in various places below)

>  memory they refer to. This is why a memory barrier is generally
>  used before the index update, to ensure it sees the most up-to-date
>  copy.
> 
> -The index field always increments, and we let it wrap naturally at
> +The index field always increments, and wraps naturally at
>  65536:
> 
>  \begin{lstlisting}