[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio] [PATCH 2/5] feedback: drop use of "we"
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> writes: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:10:23 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > >> explicitly say driver/device or use passive form >> as appropriate. >> >> Cc: Arun Subbarao <asubbarao@lnxw.com> >> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> >> --- >> content.tex | 18 ++++++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> > >> @@ -663,12 +664,12 @@ device), so we keep a counter of how many we've added: >> \subsubsection{Updating The Index Field}\label{sec:General Initialization And Device Operation / Device Operation / Supplying Buffers to The Device / Updating The Index Field} >> >> Once the index field of the virtqueue is updated, the device will >> -be able to access the descriptor chains we've created and the >> +be able to access the descriptor chains that driver created and the > > s/driver/the driver/ ? > > (also in various places below) Yes, by my count there are four. With that changed: Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Thanks, Rusty.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]