[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH 1/1] ccw: ccw payload description
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:53:22 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com> wrote: > Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> writes: > > On Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:27:26 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:25:31PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > >> Sounds good, let's do that. And let's add a comment > >> where we define leXX. > > > > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio/201401/msg00089.html adds > > definitions for leXX types, among other things. > > Yes, I assume that will pass at the next meeting, then we can extend > it. It's actually hard to do in a meaningful way. Here's my attempt: > > \item[le16, le32, le64] An unsigend integer of the specified length in bits, > in little-endian byte order. (Those implementing legacy compatibility > should be aware that most little-endian fields were native-endian in > earlier drafts: see \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / > Feature Bits / Legacy Interface: A Note on transitions from earlier > drafts}). > > Thoughts? > Rusty. > > Not sure whether we want to annotate the definition. I'd expect a hint like that more in the general section.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]