[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] give explicit guidance on the use of 64 bit fields
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 04:06:28PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > Just saying 64 bit fields may not be atomic is true, but less helpful > than it might be. Add explicit guidance about what the consequences of > non-atomicity are > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Odin.com> > > --- > diff --git a/newdevice.tex b/newdevice.tex > index c7e6221..12123b9 100644 > --- a/newdevice.tex > +++ b/newdevice.tex > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ large). > > Remember that configuration fields over 32 bits wide might not be > atomically writable by the driver. > +Therefore, no writeable field which triggers an action should be wider than 32 > +bits. > > \section{What Device Number?}\label{sec:Creating New Device Types / What Device Number?} > > > It's best to avoid the word "should" outside normative statements. Can you rephrase this? -- MST
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]