RE: [PATCH v13 3/5] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_SG

["Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>]

On Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:23 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 02:38:17PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > +static void send_one_sg(struct virtio_balloon *vb, struct virtqueue *vq,
> > +			void *addr, uint32_t size)
> > +{
> > +	struct scatterlist sg;
> > +	unsigned int len;
> > +
> > +	sg_init_one(&sg, addr, size);
> > +	while (unlikely(virtqueue_add_inbuf(vq, &sg, 1, vb, GFP_KERNEL)
> > +			== -ENOSPC)) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * It is uncommon to see the vq is full, because the sg is sent
> > +		 * one by one and the device is able to handle it in time. But
> > +		 * if that happens, we kick and wait for an entry is released.
> 
> is released -> to get used.
> 
> > +		 */
> > +		virtqueue_kick(vq);
> > +		while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len) &&
> > +		       !virtqueue_is_broken(vq))
> > +			cpu_relax();
> 
> Please rework to use wait_event in that case too.

For the balloon page case here, it is fine to use wait_event. But for the free page
case, I think it might not be suitable because the mm lock is being held.

Best,
Wei