Re: [PATCH 2/2] introduction: simplify the designation of legacy

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Fri,  9 Feb 2018 20:59:14 +0100
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> The sentence designating the documents defining what later
> became known as the legacy virtio interface had the most
> important piece of information placed in parenthesis.
> 
> Let's reword this sentence so we avoid using an ambiguous designation
> based on a relative anchor (i.e. 'earlier drafts of this specification')
> and just use the absolute anchor (version 1.0).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  introduction.tex |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/introduction.tex b/introduction.tex
> index 979881e..78c340d 100644
> --- a/introduction.tex
> +++ b/introduction.tex
> @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ The key words ``MUST'', ``MUST NOT'', ``REQUIRED'', ``SHALL'', ``SHALL NOT'', ``
>  \subsection{Legacy Interface: Terminology}\label{intro:Legacy
>  Interface: Terminology}
>  
> -Earlier drafts of this specification (i.e. revisions before 1.0,
> -see e.g. \hyperref[intro:Virtio PCI Draft]{[Virtio PCI Draft]})
> +Specification drafts preceding version 1.0 of this specification
> +(e.g. see \hyperref[intro:Virtio PCI Draft]{[Virtio PCI Draft]})
>  defined a similar, but different
>  interface between the driver and the device.
>  Since these are widely deployed, this specification

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>