Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ccw: be more precise the semantic of revision 1

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:25:12PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/12/2018 01:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri,  9 Feb 2018 20:59:13 +0100
> > Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > s/precise/precise about/
> 
> Nod. Should I spin a v2 or is it better handled
> via fixup by maintainer?

I prefer a respin. How about that jira issue(s)?
You could then also include the # in the patch commit log then.
Just say

VIRTIO-XXXX

in the commit log

> > 
> >> Revision 1 of the CCW transport is currently defined as virtio 1.0. This
> >> could become confusing when we bump the version of the virtio
> >> specification to 1.1, in a sense that it could be interpreted like one
> >> can not use any features not part of the 1.0 specification.
> >>
> >> So let us try to avoid confusion regarding the semantic of virtio-ccw
> >> revision 1.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  content.tex |    2 +-
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> >> index c7ef7fd..86044dd 100644
> >> --- a/content.tex
> >> +++ b/content.tex
> >> @@ -2572,7 +2572,7 @@ The following values are supported:
> >>  \hline \hline
> >>  0        & 0      & <empty>   & legacy interface; transitional devices only \\
> >>  \hline
> >> -1        & 0      & <empty>   & Virtio 1.0 \\
> >> +1        & 0      & <empty>   & Virtio 1 \\
> >>  \hline
> >>  2        & 0      & <empty>   & CCW_CMD_READ_STATUS support \\
> >>  \hline
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> >