Re: [PATCH 2/5] consistency: clean up stale wording for v1.1 terms

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:04:51 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 04/10/2018 11:30 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon,  9 Apr 2018 20:58:39 +0200
> > Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> Occasionally we still use used and available ring instead of Device and
> >> Driver Area respectively. Same goes for descriptor table with the
> >> difference that depending on the context we need either Descriptor Area
> >> or descriptor ring.
> >>
> >> Let's clean these up, at least where the cleanup is trivial.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  content.tex     |   14 +++++++-------
> >>  packed-ring.tex |   10 ++++++----
> >>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>  
> >   
> >> -\drivernormative{\subsection}{The Virtqueue Descriptor Table}{Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / PAcked Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Table}
> >> +\drivernormative{\subsection}{The Virtqueue Descriptor Ring}{Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / PAcked Virtqueues / The Virtqueue Descriptor Ring}  
> > 
> > While you're touching it anyway: s/PAcked/Packed/ ? (Probably needs a
> > change in conformance.tex as well.)
> >   
> 
> Yeah, the thing with unrelated changes. Was considering it myself,
> and decided not to since I'm doing basically the same change in
> may places here. But I can do it next time.

OK, if it's in more than one place, let's do it in a separate patch and
clean up all of them.