OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-dev message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available

On 4/10/2018 8:22 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:13:40PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com wrote:
On 4/10/2018 3:55 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 08:47:06PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com wrote:
On 4/9/2018 1:07 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 12:59:14AM CEST, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com wrote:
On 4/6/2018 5:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:08:22PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com wrote:

+static int virtnet_bypass_join_child(struct net_device *bypass_netdev,
+				     struct net_device *child_netdev)
+	struct virtnet_bypass_info *vbi;
+	bool backup;
+	vbi = netdev_priv(bypass_netdev);
+	backup = (child_netdev->dev.parent == bypass_netdev->dev.parent);
+	if (backup ? rtnl_dereference(vbi->backup_netdev) :
+			rtnl_dereference(vbi->active_netdev)) {
+		netdev_info(bypass_netdev,
+			    "%s attempting to join bypass dev when %s already present\n",
+			    child_netdev->name, backup ? "backup" : "active");
Bypass module should check if there is already some other netdev
enslaved and refuse right there.
This will work for virtio-net with 3 netdev model, but this check has to be done by netvsc
as its bypass_netdev is same as the backup_netdev.
Will add a flag while registering with the bypass module to indicate if the driver is doing
a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module
for 3 netdev scenario.
Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be
between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this:

        /     \
       /       \
VF_slave   backup_slave

Is that correct? If not, how does it look like?

Looks correct.
VF_slave and backup_slave are the original netdevs and are present in both the models.
In the 3 netdev model, bypass_master netdev is created and VF_slave and backup_slave are
marked as the 2 slaves of this new netdev.
You say it looks correct and in another sentence you provide completely
different description. Could you please look again?

To be exact, 2 netdev model with netvsc looks like this.


With virtio_net, 3 netdev model

      /     \
     /       \
VF_slave   virtio_net netdev
Could you also mark the original netdev which is there now? is it
bypass_netdev or virtio_net_netdev ?

     /     \
    /       \
VF_slave   virtio_net netdev (original)

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]