Re: [RFC] content: use a consistent wording for device status

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:32:21 +0800
Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com> wrote:

> There is a part called "device status field" in a
> Virtio device. Currently, both of \field{status}
> and \field{device status} are used to refer to it,
> which is a bit confusing. This patch changes spec
> to use \field{device status} consistently.
> 
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> ---
> If we want this change, I'll open an issue and
> send a formal patch.

Sounds good, given that there are some device-type specific 'status'
fields, which makes things confusing.

> 
>  content.tex | 21 ++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Patch looks good.

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>