Re: [RFC] content: use a consistent wording for device status

[Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:05:52AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:32:21 +0800
> Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > There is a part called "device status field" in a
> > Virtio device. Currently, both of \field{status}
> > and \field{device status} are used to refer to it,
> > which is a bit confusing. This patch changes spec
> > to use \field{device status} consistently.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> > ---
> > If we want this change, I'll open an issue and
> > send a formal patch.
> 
> Sounds good, given that there are some device-type specific 'status'
> fields, which makes things confusing.
> 
> > 
> >  content.tex | 21 ++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> Patch looks good.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>

Thank you very much for the review! :)

I'll open an issue and send a new patch (just
to drop the "RFC" from the subject) with your
Reviewed-by.

Best regards,
Tiwei Bie