[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v3] content: enhance device requirements for feature bits
On 06/15/2018 03:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 02:42:58PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:On 06/15/2018 02:19 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 02:10:11PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:On 06/11/2018 09:56 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com> Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/14 --- v2: - Refine the wording (Cornelia); v3: - Refine the wording (MST); content.tex | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex index f996fad..3c7d67d 100644 --- a/content.tex +++ b/content.tex @@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ which was not offered. The device SHOULD accept any valid subset of features the driver accepts, otherwise it MUST fail to set the FEATURES_OK \field{device status} bit when the driver writes it. +If a device has successfully negotiated a set of features +at least once (by accepting the FEATURES_OK \field{device +status} bit during device initialization), then it SHOULD +NOT fail re-negotiation of the same set of features after +a device or system reset. Failure to do so would interfere +with resuming from suspend and error recovery. +Sorry people but I don't get it. I mean it is kind of reasonable to assume that with a given device and a given driver (given, i.e. nothing changes) the two will always negotiate the same features (including the extremal case where the negotiation fails). Either the device or a driver rolling a dice to make feature negotiation more fun seems quite unreasonable. So I assume this is not what we are bothering to soft prohibit here. So the interesting scenario seems to be when stuff changes. When migrating the implementation of the device could change. Or something changes regarding the resources used to provide the virtual device. But then, if the device really can not support the set of features it used to be able, I guess the SHOULD does not take effect (I guess that is the difference compared to MUST). Bottom line is: I tried to figure out what is this about, but I failed. I've read https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/14 too but it did not click. I would appreciate some assistance.It's exactly what it says. Let's say you negotiated a feature and then device sets NEED_RESET. Driver must now reset the device and put it back in the same state it had before the reset, then resubmit requests that were available but never used. What if any of the features changed? Device suddenly needs to check for requests which do not match the features. Suspend is similar: guests tend to assume hardware does not change across suspend/resume, any changes tend to make resume fail.Thank you very much! But it still does not answer why would a device want to do that (fail to negotiate a feature that it was able to negotiate before). So I'm still in the dark about what are we trading for what.It would be a mis-configured device. For example QEMU does not migrate the device features so if you misconfigure QEMU with different flags on source and destination (not a supported configuration), features might seem to change from guest POV.
Do you mean set (or rather restrict) what QEMU calls the host_features? AFAIR there is no reset right after the migration. But yes if then there is a reset and another migration. After a lots of thinking, it seems you speak about the scenario I described in the answer to Tiwei Bie. But there I also say that this statement you add here is not good enough for that. Still puzzled.
Is there somewhere a patch that fixes such a bug? Maybe that would help me understand what can be done at the device to avoid the problem. Regards, Halil\subsection{Legacy Interface: A Note on Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature Bits / Legacy Interface: A Note on Feature Bits}--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]