OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

virtio-dev message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2] Add virtio rpmb device specification



> > ---
> >  conformance.tex |  19 ++++++++++-
> >  content.tex     |   3 ++
> >  virtio-rpmb.tex | 100
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)  create mode 100644
> > virtio-rpmb.tex
> >
> 
> (...)

Sorry, what do you mean?

> 
> > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex index ee0d7c9..7f54f94 100644
> > --- a/content.tex
> > +++ b/content.tex
> > @@ -2717,6 +2717,8 @@ \chapter{Device Types}\label{sec:Device Types}
> > \hline
> >  27         &   PMEM device \\
> >  \hline
> > +28         &   RPMB device \\
> 
> Depending on how long it will take to get this into shape, it might be a good idea
> to reserve the id separately.

Thanks. I will remove this change at current phase.

> > +\hline
> >  \end{tabular}
> >
> >  Some of the devices above are unspecified by this document, @@
> > -5677,6 +5679,7 @@ \subsubsection{Legacy Interface: Framing
> > Requirements}\label{sec:Device  \input{virtio-input.tex}
> > \input{virtio-crypto.tex}  \input{virtio-vsock.tex}
> > +\input{virtio-rpmb.tex}
> >
> >  \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
> >
> > diff --git a/virtio-rpmb.tex b/virtio-rpmb.tex new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..aa113bb
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/virtio-rpmb.tex
> > @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
> > +\section{RPMB Device}\label{sec:Device Types / RPMB Device}
> > +
> > +virtio-rpmb is a virtio based RPMB (Replay Protected Memory Block)
> > +device. It is used as a tamper-resistant and anti-replay storage.
> > +It supports four command requests including read, write, get write
> > +counter and program key. They are placed in the queue.
> 
> What about replacing the last two sentences with:
> 
> "The device is driven via requests including read, write, get write counter, and
> program key, which are submitted via a request queue." ?

I will update it.

> > +
> > +\subsection{Device ID}\label{sec:Device Types / RPMB Device / Device
> > +ID}
> > +
> > +28
> > +
> > +\subsection{Virtqueues}\label{sec:Device Types / RPMB Device /
> > +Virtqueues}
> > +
> > +\begin{description}
> > +\item[0] requestq
> > +\end{description}
> > +
> > +\subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / RPMB Device /
> > +Feature bits}
> > +
> > +None.
> > +
> > +\subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types /
> > +RPMB Device / Device configuration layout}
> > +
> > +None.
> > +
> > +\devicenormative{\subsection}{Device Initialization}{Device Types /
> > +RPMB Device / Device Initialization}
> > +
> > +\begin{enumerate}
> > +\item The virtqueue is initialized.
> > +\item The authentication key of device SHOULD NOT be programmed at the
> first device initialization.
> > +\item The device capacity SHOULD be initialized to a multiple of 128 Kbytes
> and up to 16Mbytes.
> > +\end{enumerate}
> 
> I would place a slightly more verbose description of how the device should be
> initialized into a descriptive section and only leave the normative statements
> here.
> 
> Also, why SHOULD/SHOULD NOT instead of MUST/MUST NOT? Especially the
> device capacity requirements feel like something that should not be too loosely
> defined.

Agree.
 
> Would it make sense to expose the capacity through the config space?

Normally, an application could read the address from 16MB to 8MB, 4MB, 2MB ...
to get the correct capacity from the error code of result.
But I agree that setting the capacity as an always present config is better.

> 
> > +
> > +\subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / RPMB Device /
> > +Device Operation}
> > +
> > +The operation of a virtio RPMB device is driven by the requests placed on the
> virtqueue.
> > +  The type of the request can be program key
> > +(VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_PROGRAM_KEY),
> > +  get write counter (VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_GET_WRITE_COUNTER),
> > +  write (VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_DATA_WRITE), and read
> (VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_DATA_READ).
> > +  A program key or write request can also combine with a
> > +  result read (VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_RESULT_READ) for a returned result.
> > +
> > +\begin{lstlisting}
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_PROGRAM_KEY        0x0001
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_GET_WRITE_COUNTER  0x0002
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_DATA_WRITE         0x0003
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_DATA_READ          0x0004
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_REQ_RESULT_READ        0x0005
> > +\end{lstlisting}
> 
> What form do the requests that are placed on the queue take?

This is defined by spec, like eMMC spec:
https://www.jedec.org/sites/default/files/docs/JESD84-B51.pdf,
at Chapter 6.6.22: Replay Protected Memory Block.
It acts as req_resp  of RPMB frame:
/**
 * struct rpmb_frame_jdec - rpmb frame as defined by JDEC specs
 *
 * @stuff        : stuff bytes
 * @key_mac      : The authentication key or the message authentication
 *                 code (MAC) depending on the request/response type.
 *                 The MAC will be delivered in the last (or the only)
 *                 block of data.
 * @data         : Data to be written or read by signed access.
 * @nonce        : Random number generated by the host for the requests
 *                 and copied to the response by the RPMB engine.
 * @write_counter: Counter value for the total amount of the successful
 *                 authenticated data write requests made by the host.
 * @addr         : Address of the data to be programmed to or read
 *                 from the RPMB. Address is the serial number of
 *                 the accessed block (half sector 256B).
 * @block_count  : Number of blocks (half sectors, 256B) requested to be
 *                 read/programmed.
 * @result       : Includes information about the status of the write counter
 *                 (valid, expired) and result of the access made to the RPMB.
 * @req_resp     : Defines the type of request and response to/from the memory.
 */
struct rpmb_frame_jdec {
        __u8   stuff[196];
        __u8   key_mac[32];
        __u8   data[256];
        __u8   nonce[16];
        __be32 write_counter;
        __be16 addr;
        __be16 block_count;
        __be16 result;
        __be16 req_resp;
}

A user should fill the rpmb frame per his request and send it to virtio rpmb driver.
The driver then format it to virtqueue and send it to device.

Is it necessary to mention this rpmb frame? 

> > +
> > +\drivernormative{\subsubsection}{Device Operation}{Device Types /
> > +RPMB Device / Device Operation}
> > +
> > +The driver MUST configure and initialize all virtqueues for the requests
> received.
> 
> But there is only a single virtqueue, isn't there? This requirement looks a bit odd.

Agree. I will update it.
 
> > +
> > +\devicenormative{\subsubsection}{Device Operation}{Device Types /
> > +RPMB Device / Device Operation}
> > +
> > +The device provides a simulated RPMB backed by ordinary file or
> > +  other medium in host. It SHOULD keep consistent behaviors with
> > +  hardware, including but not limited to:
> 
> If this device is supposed to simulate the behaviour of a real device, the virtio
> spec needs to point to a specification of that behaviour as a normative
> reference. From the information contained here, I would have no clue how to
> actually produce a conforming device or driver implementation.

I think the spec of eMMC RPMB could be a reference: 
https://www.jedec.org/sites/default/files/docs/JESD84-B51.pdf 

> > +\begin{enumerate}
> > +\item The device maintains an authentication key. Once the first
> > +   successful key programming is performed, the authentication
> > +   key MUST be kept unchanged during device lifecycle. It cannot
> > +   be overwritten, erased or read. This key MUST be kept regardless
> > +   of device reset or reboot.
> > +\item The device maintains a monotonic write counter. It MUST be
> > +   initialized to zero and added by one automatically after each
> > +   successful write operation. The value cannot be reset. After
> > +   the counter has reached its maximum value 0xFFFFFFFF, it will
> > +   not be incremented anymore. This counter MUST be kept regardless
> > +   of device reset or reboot.
> > +\item The RPMB device cannot be successfully accessed until RPMB
> > +   authentication key is programmed. For any operation (read, write,
> > +   program key, get write counter) done to virtio RPMB device after
> > +   authentication key is programmed successfully, the device responds
> > +   with a MAC calculated by HMAC-SHA with authentication key to driver.
> > +\item For write operation, the device MUST compare the writer counter
> > +   it receives with the one it maintained internally. If the two are
> > +   not equal, a VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_COUNT_FAILURE SHOULD be returned as
> > +   the result. The device MUST calculate the MAC using HMAC-SHA. The
> > +   authentication key acts as an input of the calculation. If the MAC
> > +   are not equal to the one it received, a VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_AUTH_FAILURE
> > +   SHOULD be returned as the result.
> > +\item
> > +\end{enumerate}
> 
> I think the spec would again benefit from putting the verbose description of
> what the driver needs to do to access the device and how the device needs to
> react into a descriptive section, and only keep some simple normative
> statements here.

What the driver need to do is pretty simple. It just need to format the RPMB frames
sent from user to virtqueue, and send it to device.
While what the device need to do is pretty complex. Besides providing RPMB spec,
is it necessary to illustrate the behaviors of four requests that device should react?

> > +
> > +One of the below error codes MUST be returned to the driver
> > +  based on the operation result.
> > +
> > +\begin{lstlisting}
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_OK                     0x0000
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_GENERAL_FAILURE        0x0001
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_AUTH_FAILURE           0x0002
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_COUNT_FAILURE          0x0003
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_ADDR_FAILURE           0x0004
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_WRITE_FAILURE          0x0005
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_READ_FAILURE           0x0006
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_NO_AUTH_KEY            0x0007
> > +#define VIRTIO_RPMB_RES_WRITE_COUNTER_EXPIRED  0x0080



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]