[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] snd: Add virtio sound device specification
On 11.11.2019 16:20, Liam Girdwood wrote:
On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 10:42 +0100, Anton Yakovlev wrote:Hi Liam, Thank you for comments! Please, take a look at our answers below.Apologies, been travelling. More comments below.On 28.10.2019 17:05, Liam Girdwood wrote:On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 15:43 +0100, Mikhail Golubev wrote:From: Anton Yakovlev <Anton.Yakovlev@opensynergy.com> This patch proposes virtio specification for new virtio sound device. The virtio sound card is a virtual audio device supporting output and input PCM streams.Apologies for the delay in response, I've just been made aware of this spec proposal on this list. I've also added Mark and Takashi. Just to make you aware I'm working on a spec for DSP virtualisation, where the DSP can do more than just simple audio uses cases. I intend to support this spec as a fallback for guests who request non DSP audio functionality, hence my interest :) This spec looks in the right direction for virtualising non DSP audio devices (where we have HW for DMAC, I2S/HDA and a codec IC). There are a few opens that I've detailed below.Originally, this spec was supposed to be extendable. Since PCM is the simplest and most demandable feature, we decided to start only with this one.Signed-off-by: Anton Yakovlev <Anton.Yakovlev@opensynergy.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Golubev <Mikhail.Golubev@opensynergy.com> --- Fixes from RFC: * Use fixed virtqueue numbers for the control and PCM queues * Use device feature bits to indicate available input/output PCM streams * Place PCM stream configuration into the device configuration space * Add sound device and driver requirements into the "Device Initialization" subsection * Add sound device and driver requirements into the "Device Operation" subsection * Add sound device and driver conformance subsections RFC link:https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201908/msg00078.htmlconformance.tex | 20 +++ content.tex | 1 + virtio-sound.tex | 405 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 426 insertions(+) create mode 100644 virtio-sound.tex diff --git a/conformance.tex b/conformance.tex index 0ac58aa..31595bf 100644 --- a/conformance.tex +++ b/conformance.tex @@ -183,6 +183,16 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets} \item \ref{drivernormative:Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Device Events} \end{itemize} +\conformance{\subsection}{Sound Driver Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Driver Conformance / Sound Driver Conformance} + +A sound driver MUST conform to the following normative statements: + +\begin{itemize} +\item \ref{drivernormative:Device Types / Sound Device / Device Initialization} +\item \ref{drivernormative:Device Types / Sound Device / PCM control requests} +\item \ref{drivernormative:Device Types / Sound Device / PCM IO requests} +\end{itemize} + \conformance{\section}{Device Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance} A device MUST conform to the following normative statements: @@ -338,6 +348,16 @@ \section{Conformance Targets}\label{sec:Conformance / Conformance Targets} \item \ref{devicenormative:Device Types / Socket Device / Device Operation / Receive and Transmit} \end{itemize} +\conformance{\subsection}{Sound Device Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Device Conformance / Sound Device Conformance} + +A sound device MUST conform to the following normative statements: + +\begin{itemize} +\item \ref{devicenormative:Device Types / Sound Device / Device Initialization} +\item \ref{devicenormative:Device Types / Sound Device / PCM control requests} +\item \ref{devicenormative:Device Types / Sound Device / PCM IO requests} +\end{itemize} + \conformance{\section}{Legacy Interface: Transitional Device and Transitional Driver Conformance}\label{sec:Conformance / Legacy Interface: Transitional Device and Transitional Driver Conformance} A conformant implementation MUST be either transitional or non-transitional, see \ref{intro:Legacy diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex index 37a2190..4a00884 100644 --- a/content.tex +++ b/content.tex @@ -5682,6 +5682,7 @@ \subsubsection{Legacy Interface: Framing Requirements}\label{sec:Device \input{virtio-input.tex} \input{virtio-crypto.tex} \input{virtio-vsock.tex} +\input{virtio-sound.tex} \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits} diff --git a/virtio-sound.tex b/virtio-sound.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..68a606e --- /dev/null +++ b/virtio-sound.tex @@ -0,0 +1,405 @@ +\section{Sound Device}\label{sec:Device Types / Sound Device} + +The virtio sound card is a virtual audio device supporting output and input PCM +streams. All device control requests are placed into the control virtqueue, all +I/O requests are placed into the PCM virtqueue.Where are stream position updates placed ? These are usually synchronous from the driver and enable the player application to render or read data from the correct locations in the buffers. This is latency sensitive data.It happens in an interrupt handler. Since PCM frame transfer is message based, the only possible way to figure out consumed or captured amount of frames is to take a look into a message response.Ok, this is what I thought. This wont work for low latency audio use cases since the buffers and position responses are queued (voice calls, some gaming, some system notifications like keypress or volume change).
But it's not different from typical HW. A driver receives an interrupt once DMA transaction is finished (i.e. some part of data was copied to/from host). And hardware pointer value usually is extrapolated based on some internal device state. A virtio driver could do something similar: it could either return "real" pointer value (i.e. what it internally uses) or could show fake "extrapolated" value (like frame_rate * elappsed_time). Although, it's a different story.
However, it's probably tolerable for most other use cases. What use cases have you tried in your testing ?
All typical cases: multimedia (video + audio or audio only), network streaming, video calls, system events, volume changing and so on.
By the way, could you define the "low latency" term that we are talking about? Just to be on the same wave.
+ +\subsection{Device ID}\label{sec:Device Types / Sound Device / Device ID} + +25 + +\subsection{Virtqueues}\label{sec:Device Types / Sound Device / Virtqueues} + +\begin{description} +\item[0] controlq +\item[1] pcmq +\end{description} + +The controlq virtqueue always exists, the pcmq virtqueue only exists if +the VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_OUTPUT and/or VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_INPUT feature is negotiated. + +\subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Sound Device / Feature bits} + +\begin{description} +\item[VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_OUTPUT (0)] Output PCM stream support. +\item[VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_INPUT (1)] Input PCM stream support. +\end{description} + +\subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Sound Device / Device configuration layout} + +\begin{lstlisting} +/* supported PCM sample formats */ +enum { + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_FMT_S8 = 0, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_FMT_U8, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_FMT_S16, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_FMT_U16,24 bit.
These kinds of sample (18/20/24-bit) were discussed here earlier and caused some concerns (regarding supporting in a guest, testing and so on), so they were removed for simplicity.
From other side, if we are up to add these, maybe it's better not to hardcode format names and use some kind of generic description instead? Something like
struct { kind; /* S/U/F */ significant_bits; storage_bits; }It allows to describe formats like 24 and 24_3 in unified way and to add future formats without changing the protocol. What do you think?
+ VIRTIO_SND_PCM_FMT_S32, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_FMT_U32, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_FMT_FLOAT, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_FMT_FLOAT64 +}; + +/* supported PCM frame rates */ +enum { + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_8000 = 0, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_11025, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_16000, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_22050, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_32000, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_44100, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_48000, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_64000, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_88200, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_96000, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_176400, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_192000It may be best to use the same rates and format from the ALSA spec, this covers any holes (like rates that are not in the above list).These rates are from ALSA definitions. And what formats should be added?Rate, Knot - I would copy ALSA supported rates and formats just like with the channel maps.
See a comment above.
+}; + +/* a PCM stream configuration */ +struct virtio_pcm_stream_config { + u8 channels_min; + u8 channels_max; + le16 formats; /* 1 << VIRTIO_SND_PCM_FMT_XXX */ + le16 rates; /* 1 << VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_XXX */ + u16 padding; +};Should this be packed ? Btw, padding alignment is to a non 32bit size ?It should be naturally packed if padding is correct. And do you mean 8 and 16-bit fields? You can read one or two bytes from device configuration space, it should not be a problem.What about buffer/period formats e.g interleaved ?Yeah, support only for interleaved layout previously was stated in the specification but occasionally was lost. Will be fixed!+ +/* a device configuration space */ +struct virtio_snd_config { + struct virtio_pcm_config { + struct virtio_pcm_stream_config output; + struct virtio_pcm_stream_config input; + } pcm; +}; +\end{lstlisting}I assuming this is sent to configure PCM capabilities ?Yes, minimum amount of information required to setup a PCM stream in any kind of guest.What about buffer and period size capabilities ?In this specification we assume that buffer size is up to guest decision. Also, period size is ALSA-only conception and should not be mentioned here at all (we are not stick only to ALSA).Period size == fragment size == block size (probably a few other naming conventions too), we should be able to tell the device VM our period/block/fragment size so we can configure the HW appropriately. This can also be used to make our stream copying more efficient too.
Then let's talk about playback. As I can understand, you are describing a case, when
1. ALSA application sets some period size 2. fills the whole buffer with non-silence frames 3. upon every period notification, provides next period-sized part of dataIt's one of use cases, but quite rare. More often (especially if we are talking about latency control and low latency audio) things will be
1. an application fills the whole buffer with silence 2. suppresses period notifications 3. starts stream and almost immediatly seeks to near hw position 4. puts non-silence frames there (size is set according to desired latency) 5. provides new frames at some interval (usually in 5-10ms)It's how software mixers usually work: PulseAudio, Windows in-kernel mixer, new Android system mixer and so on. Also, you can find such approach in low latency player applications (when they work directly with device).
The point is they do not rely on notifications from the driver and use their own timers. The only thing they querying is current hw position.
The point is we could have period notifications from the device. But it seems they will be useful only in minority of cases. Also, for example, Windows audio driver has no such concept at all.
+ +\subsubsection{Device configuration fields} + +The \field{pcm.output} and \field{pcm.input} fields contain PCM stream +configuration: + +\begin{description} +\item[\field{channels_min}] (driver-read-only) is a minimum number of supported +channels. +\item[\field{channels_max}] (driver-read-only) is a maximum number of supported +channels. +\item[\field{formats}] (driver-read-only) is supported sample format bit map. +\item[\field{rates}] (driver-read-only) is supported frame rate bit map. +\end{description} + +\subsection{Device Initialization} + +\begin{enumerate} +\item If the VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_OUTPUT feature is negotiated, \field{pcm.output} +contains valid output PCM stream configuration. +\item If the VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_INPUT feature is negotiated, \field{pcm.input} +contains valid input PCM stream configuration. +\end{enumerate} + +\devicenormative{\subsubsection}{Device Initialization}{Device Types / Sound Device / Device Initialization} + +\begin{enumerate} +\item The device MUST NOT set the not defined format and rate bits. +\item The device MUST initialize padding bytes \field{pcm.output.padding} and +\field{pcm.input.padding} to 0. +\end{enumerate} + +\drivernormative{\subsubsection}{Device Initialization}{Device Types / Sound Device / Device Initialization} + +\begin{enumerate} +\item The driver MUST configure and initialize all virtqueues. +\item The driver SHOULD ignore the not defined format and rate bits. +\end{enumerate} + +\subsection{Device Operation}\label{sec:Device Types / Sound Device / Device Operation} + +All control messages are placed into the controlq virtqueue and use the following +layout structure and definitions: + +\begin{lstlisting} +enum { + /* PCM control request types */ + VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_CHMAP_INFO = 0, + VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_SET_FORMAT, + VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_PREPARE, + VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_START, + VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_STOP, + VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_PAUSE, + VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_UNPAUSE, + + /* generic status codes */ + VIRTIO_SND_S_OK = 0x8000, + VIRTIO_SND_S_BAD_MSG, + VIRTIO_SND_S_NOT_SUPP, + VIRTIO_SND_S_IO_ERR +}; + +struct virtio_snd_ctl_msg { + /* device-read-only data */ + le32 request_code; + u8 request_payload[];How do I know how much data to read here ? Is size embedded in request_code ?Yes, you are right. Actual request/response length can be easily derived from a request_code.Nak, please use a separate size and type code otherwise we will have real problems in the future when we come to add new features (with new codes or bigger sizes).
But virtqueue descriptors already contain size information. Usually, there's API for getting readable/writable size in virtqueue sg-chains. And it's possible to get request size using something like
vq_readable_size(...) - sizeof(request_code) and the same for response size vq_writable_size(...) - sizeof(response_status)Originally, the proposed spec contained separate size fields. But these seem redundant, since virtqueue does all the work.
+ /* device-writable data */ + le32 response_status; + u8 response_payload[]; +}; +\end{lstlisting} + +A generic control message consists of request and response parts and contains +the following fields: + +\begin{description} +\item[\field{request_code}] (device-read-only) specifies a device request code +(VIRTIO_SND_R_*). +\item[\field{request_payload}] (device-read-only) contains request- specific +data. +\item[\field{response_status}] (device-writable) specifies a device response +status (VIRTIO_SND_S_*). +\item[\field{response_payload}] (device-writable) contains response- specific +data. +\end{description} + +Unless stated otherwise, the \field{request_payload} and \field{response_payload} +fields are empty. + +The \field{response_status} field contains one of the following values: + +\begin{itemize*} +\item VIRTIO_SND_S_OK: success. +\item VIRTIO_SND_S_BAD_MSG: a control message is malformed or contains invalid +parameters. +\item VIRTIO_SND_S_NOT_SUPP: requested operation or parameters are not supported. +\item VIRTIO_SND_S_IO_ERR: an I/O error occurred. +\end{itemize*} + +\subsubsection{Device Operation: PCM control requests} + +A PCM stream has the following command lifecycle: + +\begin{enumerate} +\item Set format +\item Prepare +\item Output only: transfer data for prebuffing +\item Start +\item Transfer data to/from the PCM device +\begin{enumerate} + \item Pause + \item Unpause +\end{enumerate} +\item Stop +\end{enumerate} + +PCM control requests have or consist of a fixed header with the following +layout structure: + +\begin{lstlisting} +/* supported PCM stream types */ +enum { + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_T_OUTPUT = 0, + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_T_INPUTCan we rename these PLAYBACK and CAPTUREPlayback and capture are used in ALSA drivers, sink and source are used in Windows drivers. We decided to stick to something obvious in-between (and it's just shorter). Although, it's still discussable topic.+}; + +/* PCM control request header */ +struct virtio_snd_pcm_hdr { + le32 code; + le32 stream; +}; +\end{lstlisting} + +PCM control request fields: + +\begin{description} +\item[\field{code}] (device-read-only) specifies a PCM device request code +(VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_*). +\item[\field{stream}] (device-read-only) specifies a PCM stream type +(VIRTIO_SND_PCM_T_*). +\end{description} + +\begin{description} + +\item[VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_CHMAP_INFO] +Query a PCM channel map information for specified stream type. + +A response uses the following layout structure and definitions: + +\begin{lstlisting} +/* standard channel position definition */ +enum { + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_NONE = 0, /* undefined */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_NA, /* silent */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_MONO, /* mono stream */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_FL, /* front left */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_FR, /* front right */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_RL, /* rear left */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_RR, /* rear right */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_FC, /* front center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_LFE, /* low frequency (LFE) */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_SL, /* side left */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_SR, /* side right */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_RC, /* rear center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_FLC, /* front left center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_FRC, /* front right center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_RLC, /* rear left center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_RRC, /* rear right center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_FLW, /* front left wide */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_FRW, /* front right wide */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_FLH, /* front left high */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_FCH, /* front center high */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_FRH, /* front right high */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TC, /* top center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TFL, /* top front left */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TFR, /* top front right */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TFC, /* top front center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TRL, /* top rear left */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TRR, /* top rear right */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TRC, /* top rear center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TFLC, /* top front left center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TFRC, /* top front right center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TSL, /* top side left */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_TSR, /* top side right */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_LLFE, /* left LFE */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_RLFE, /* right LFE */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_BC, /* bottom center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_BLC, /* bottom left center */ + VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_BRC /* bottom right center */ +}; + +/* a maximum possible number of channels */ +#define VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_MAX 256 + +/* response containing a PCM channel map information */ +struct virtio_snd_pcm_chmap_info { + le32 status; + le32 npositions; + u8 positions[VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_MAX]; +}; +\end{lstlisting} + +PCM channel map information fields: + +\begin{description} +\item[\field{status}] (device-writable) specifies a device response status +(VIRTIO_SND_S_*). +\item[\field{npositions}] (device-writable) is a number of valid entries in +the \field{positions} array. +\item[\field{positions}] (device-writable) contains PCM channel positions +(VIRTIO_SND_PCM_CH_*). +\end{description} + +\item[VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_SET_FORMAT] +Set selected PCM format. + +\begin{lstlisting} +struct virtio_snd_pcm_set_format { + struct virtio_snd_pcm_hdr hdr; + le16 channels; + le16 format; + le16 rate; + u16 padding; +}; +\end{lstlisting} + +PCM control request fields: + +\begin{description} +\item[\field{hdr}] (device-read-only) is a PCM control request header. +\item[\field{channels}] (device-read-only) specifies a desired number of channels. +\item[\field{format}] (device-read-only) specifies a desired PCM sample format +(VIRTIO_SND_PCM_FMT_*). +\item[\field{rate}] (device-read-only) specifies a desired PCM frame rate +(VIRTIO_SND_PCM_RATE_*). +\end{description} + +\item[VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_PREPARE] +Prepare the PCM device. + +\item[VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_START] +Start the PCM device. + +\item[VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_STOP] +Stop the PCM device. + +\item[VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_PAUSE] +Set the PCM device on pause. + +\item[VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_UNPAUSE] +Unset the PCM device from pause. + +\end{description} + +\devicenormative{\subsubsection}{PCM control requests}{Device Types / Sound Device / PCM control requests} + +In a VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_CHMAP_INFO request: + +\begin{itemize*} +\item the device MUST return the VIRTIO_SND_S_NOT_SUPP status code, if it does not +support a channel map for a specified stream type; +\item the device MUST set the \field{npositions} field to 0, if the operation +failed. +\end{itemize*} + +\drivernormative{\subsubsection}{PCM control requests}{Device Types / Sound Device / PCM control requests} + +The driver MUST NOT specify VIRTIO_SND_PCM_T_OUTPUT as a stream type if +the VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_OUTPUT feature is not negotiated. + +The driver MUST NOT specify VIRTIO_SND_PCM_T_INPUT as a stream type if +the VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_INPUT feature is not negotiated. + +In a VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_SET_FORMAT request: + +\begin{itemize*} +\item the driver MUST NOT specify the \field{channels} value less than the \field{channels_min} +or greater than the \field{channels_max} values reported in stream configuration; +\item the driver MUST specify the \field{format} and \field{rate} values according +to the \field{formats} and \field{rates} values reported in stream configuration; +\item the driver MUST NOT specify the not defined format and rate values; +\item the driver MUST initialize \field{padding} bytes to 0. +\end{itemize*} + +\subsubsection{Device Operation: PCM I/O requests} + +All I/O requests are placed into the pcmq virtqueue. Each request is of form: + +\begin{lstlisting} +struct virtio_snd_pcm_xfer { + le32 stream; + u8 data[]; + le32 status; + le32 actual_length;Not following this, is actual_length the size of data[]. If so, it must preceed data[].No, the actual_length field is supposed to be used by device side to report actual amount of bytes read from/written to a buffer. In real world scenario, if an I/O request contains N bytes, a device can play/capture *up to* N bytes. Thus, it's required to report this length back to a driver.This is not how PCM audio buffering works. I don't copy extra padding if I dont need to, I only copy when my buffer is full. See the need for period size in earlier comments.
Originally, it was intended to handle a case when there's less space in device playback buffer than was expected, or when there's less available data in device capturing buffer than was expected.
+}; +\end{lstlisting} + +I/O request fields: + +\begin{description} +\item[\field{stream}] (device-read-only) specifies a PCM stream type +(VIRTIO_SND_PCM_T_*). +\item[\field{data}] +\begin{enumerate} +\item Output: (device-read-only) a buffer with PCM frames to be written to the +device. +\item Input: (device-writable) a buffer to be filled with PCM frames from the +device. +\end{enumerate} +\item[\field{status}] (device-writable) contains VIRTIO_SND_S_OK if an operation +is successful, and VIRTIO_SND_S_IO_ERR otherwise. +\item[\field{actual_length}] (device-writable) specifies an actual amount of +bytes read from/written to the \field{data} field. +\end{description} + +\devicenormative{\subsubsection}{PCM I/O requests}{Device Types / Sound Device / PCM IO requests} + +\begin{enumerate} +\item The device MUST set the \field{actual_length} field to 0, if the operation +failed. +\end{enumerate} + +\drivernormative{\subsubsection}{PCM I/O requests}{Device Types / Sound Device / PCM IO requests} + +\begin{enumerate} +\item The driver MUST NOT specify VIRTIO_SND_PCM_T_OUTPUT as a stream type if +the VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_OUTPUT feature is not negotiated. +\item The driver MUST NOT specify VIRTIO_SND_PCM_T_INPUT as a stream type if +the VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_INPUT feature is not negotiated. +\end{enumerate} -- 2.23.0I don't see anything in here about dealing with 1) Underruns and overruns. i.e. how do we recover and resync audio between guests.Since xrun conditions are higher level conceptions, we decided to delegate such issues to guest application itself. It helps to make overall design simpler. And it seems there's not so much we can do if xrun condition is happened on the device side.We can inform the guest. The guest userspace can then take any remedial action if needed.
Then, we need the third queue for notifications.
2) Zero copy of audio data and stream positions. Essential for any low latency audio use cases (if supported by HW, hypervisor, VM framework).What do you mean by zero-copy? Shared memory between device and driver sides?Yes, but I see this is now a separate thread as it used by others too.
Shared memory based approach was proposed in the very first version of the spec (and we are rooting for this). Then there was discussion and it was postponed for some future virtio device. One of the reason - it's not suitable for arch with non-coherent memory between host and guest.
Thanks Liam
-- Anton Yakovlev Senior Software Engineer OpenSynergy GmbH Rotherstr. 20, 10245 Berlin
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]